Colorado Officials Reject Trump’s ‘Pardon’ of a Convicted Election Denier: The president’s stated intention to pardon Tina Peters, jailed for tampering with election machines in 2020, has set off a legal fight over the extent of Mr. Trump’s pardon powers.
It’s pretty clear cut, really. This whole situation involving Tina Peters and Donald Trump’s attempt to “pardon” her is straightforward. Colorado’s response to Trump’s pardon declaration is a firm rejection, and honestly, that’s where it should end. The Constitution is pretty explicit on this: he can’t. He simply doesn’t have the power to overturn a state conviction. Unless he’s planning a dramatic rescue mission, she’s staying put.… Continue reading
Tina Peters, the former Mesa County clerk, is currently serving a nine-year prison sentence for crimes related to the 2020 election. She was found guilty of multiple counts including attempting to influence a public servant, conspiracy, and official misconduct for her role in allowing unauthorized access to voting machine data. Despite efforts from Donald Trump, including public pressure campaigns and threats of intervention, Peters remains incarcerated. The Justice Department has initiated a review of Peters’ case, and could potentially seek her transfer or early release.
Read More
President Trump announced his intention to pardon Tina Peters, a former Colorado county clerk serving a state sentence for election-related crimes. Peters, convicted of state charges including attempting to influence a public servant, was prosecuted in a Republican county, which has led to significant criticism. Despite the president’s claim that the pardon is related to alleged election fraud, Colorado officials, including Secretary of State Jena Griswold and Attorney General Phil Weiser, assert that the president lacks the constitutional authority to pardon state crimes. While Peters’ attorney argues that the president may have the power to pardon in this case, legal experts widely disagree, citing that the presidential pardon power is limited to federal offenses.
Read More
Trump says he is pardoning Tina Peters, a Colorado county clerk convicted of election tampering, even though he simply doesn’t have the legal right to do so. This situation is, frankly, not surprising at all given the history. It’s almost becoming a recurring theme at this point. The former president, known for pushing boundaries and often disregarding established norms, has declared a pardon that is, at best, a symbolic gesture. In reality, Tina Peters was convicted on state charges, and the power to pardon her lies solely with the governor of Colorado, not with the President of the United States.
What makes this especially noteworthy is not just the act itself, but the intent behind it.… Continue reading
Tina Peters, a Colorado election official, is currently incarcerated after being convicted on multiple charges related to unauthorized access of voting machines and attempts to influence a public servant, stemming from her actions following the 2020 election. Right-wing figures, however, have rallied behind her, portraying her as a political prisoner despite her convictions. Concerns have been raised by Peters’ supporters regarding her health and treatment while in jail, including a recent period in solitary confinement. Notably, Donald Trump has publicly advocated for Peters’ release, echoing the narrative that she is wrongly imprisoned for exposing election fraud.
Read More
Former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters, convicted on seven counts including felonies related to unauthorized access of voting equipment, is the subject of a federal intervention attempt spearheaded by President Trump. Trump, calling Peters a political prisoner, urged the Department of Justice to secure her release, echoing similar calls from Rep. Lauren Boebert. While a federal magistrate judge indicated a preference to return the case to state court due to unexhausted state remedies, the Colorado Attorney General’s office affirmed its commitment to upholding the conviction. Peters’ claims of election fraud remain unsubstantiated, and state audits have confirmed the integrity of Colorado’s 2020 and 2024 elections.
Read More
The Department of Justice will review the state’s prosecution of Tina Peters, a former county clerk convicted of election system breaches, prompted by a federal court appeal. The review will assess whether the prosecution prioritized political motivations over justice, citing concerns about the severity of her sentence relative to the offenses. This action follows a recent pattern of Trump administration influence on prosecutions, although the DOJ cannot directly overturn Peters’ state-level conviction. The Department encourages prompt consideration of Peters’ appeal.
Read More
I cannot help but revel in the justice served to Tina Peters, the Trump election conspiracist who was sentenced to 9 years in prison by a Colorado judge. The immediate custody and rejection of her lawyer’s request for freedom speaks volumes about the severity of her crimes. Watching her complain and cry about her perceived injustices during sentencing only further solidified her lack of remorse and defiance. The scathing remarks by Judge Matthew Barrett calling her a charlatan who peddles snake oil hit the nail on the head. Peters truly believed she was above the law, and it is refreshing to see consequences finally catching up to her.… Continue reading
Wow, as I read about the sentencing of former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters to prison in the Colorado election interference case, a wave of satisfaction washed over me. The fact that she was sentenced to nine years truly feels like justice has been served. Peters, a once-prominent figure seeking fame, became fixated on voting problems after getting involved with those questioning the accuracy of the 2020 presidential election results. Her actions, driven by a misguided belief in the election being stolen, led her down a path that ultimately culminated in her downfall.
Peters’ demeanor during her trial reflected a lack of remorse or accountability for her actions.… Continue reading
As I sit and reflect on the recent news of Tina Peters being found guilty on seven charges related to her involvement in post-2020 election conspiracy theories, I can’t help but feel a mix of emotions. It’s disheartening to see someone in a position of authority abuse their power and manipulate the democratic process for their own gain. The fact that Peters helped facilitate unauthorized access to voting equipment during a software update, leading to sensitive information being posted online to undermine the election system, is deeply troubling.
It’s ironic, isn’t it, that the very individuals who cry foul and claim election interference often turn out to be the ones engaging in fraudulent activities themselves?… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker