The Texas Supreme Court ruled that a legislative subpoena cannot halt a scheduled execution, allowing Robert Roberson’s execution to proceed. While the Court acknowledged the House committee’s right to seek Roberson’s testimony, it stipulated that the subpoena must not inherently block the execution. Lawmakers maintain their intent to gather Roberson’s testimony regarding his 2002 conviction for his daughter’s death, citing a 2013 law allowing challenges based on advances in forensic science. The Attorney General’s office, however, disputes the lawmakers’ claims, and the timing and manner of any further attempts to obtain testimony remain unclear.
Read More
As a woman living in the United States, recent events surrounding the Texas Supreme Court’s decision to reject a challenge to the state’s abortion law have left me feeling not just disappointed, but deeply concerned about the direction our country is heading in terms of women’s rights and healthcare. The fact that this all-Republican court unanimously upheld a law that directly impacts the lives of women, denying them the right to obtain an abortion even in cases of serious pregnancy complications, is not just a blow to reproductive freedom, but a dangerous erosion of basic human rights.
The argument that the law’s exceptions are broad enough and that doctors would be misinterpreting it by declining to perform an abortion when the mother’s life is in danger is not just flawed but utterly ludicrous.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker