A manifesto posted by surveillance giant Palantir outlines a vision for a future where technological companies play a significant role in a society prioritizing military strength and Western values, even suggesting the return of Nazi Germany and imperial Japan to power. This alarming statement, summarized from a book by co-founder Alex Karp, advocates for mandatory national military service and criticizes “cancel culture” and inclusivity. The company’s growing influence is underscored by its multi-billion dollar contracts with the Trump administration and its extensive government surveillance powers.
Read More
Despite earning $1.6 billion in net income and securing a $10 billion military contract, Palantir Technologies paid $0 in federal income taxes last year. This tax avoidance is attributed to current corporate tax policies, exacerbated by recent tax legislation, which allowed at least 88 other major profitable U.S. companies to also pay no federal income taxes. Palantir’s situation highlights how profitable corporations can leverage tax loopholes, rather than contributing to public funds, even when receiving substantial government contracts for projects like mass surveillance networks.
Read More
Following public and city council backlash concerning privacy, transparency, accountability, and public trust, Bloomington Mayor Kerry Thomson has announced the city will not renew its contract with surveillance company Flock Safety. This decision comes despite law enforcement citing the license plate reader network’s vital role in investigating serious crimes. Concerns over the system’s AI capabilities, potential misuse by federal agencies, and security breaches have fueled opposition, prompting a city council review and the administration’s commitment to evaluating alternative technologies that better balance safety and privacy.
Read More
The recent detection of drones over a military base, notably one where prominent figures like Senator Marco Rubio and former intelligence official David Hegseth reside, has sparked a flurry of discussion and speculation. This event, occurring on a military installation, raises immediate questions about security and the motivations behind such aerial intrusions. The fact that elected officials and former government figures are living on military bases, apparently for security reasons, adds a layer of intrigue to the drone sightings.
The presence of drones over a base occupied by public figures, particularly those who have been vocal on national security issues, prompts a consideration of what, or who, they might be perceived as a threat by.… Continue reading
The recent resignation of OpenAI’s robotics head following a deal with the Pentagon has ignited a flurry of discussion, and frankly, it’s a situation that raises some significant ethical questions about the future of artificial intelligence. It appears this departure stems from deep-seated concerns about the direction OpenAI is heading, particularly regarding the potential misuse of AI for surveillance and autonomous weaponry.
The core of the disagreement seems to revolve around the ethical boundaries that were perhaps not adequately considered before entering into this partnership. The idea of “surveillance of Americans without judicial oversight and lethal autonomy without human authorization” is precisely the kind of scenario that triggers alarm bells for many.… Continue reading
According to the Associated Press, U.S. lawmakers have repeatedly failed to close loopholes allowing China to access advanced American AI chips, particularly through cloud services. Despite bipartisan efforts and four attempts since September last year, proposals to restrict these sales have been thwarted, often due to significant lobbying efforts from the tech industry. This ongoing issue highlights the complex relationship between the U.S. and China, where national security concerns and human rights abuses are weighed against billions of dollars in tech sales. The government has also previously helped American firms sell technology to Chinese agencies.
Read More
The Trump administration repurposed the CBP One asylum application app as “CBP Home,” promoting self-deportation as an option for undocumented immigrants. This rebranding is coupled with a $200 million advertising campaign urging departure. Critics, however, express concerns about the app’s potential for surveillance and coercion, highlighting the lack of clarity regarding who would utilize the self-deportation feature. The move is seen as aligning with Trump’s campaign promise of mass deportations and represents a continuation of his administration’s restrictive immigration policies.
Read More
Google has revised its 2018 AI principles, removing previous restrictions on developing technologies that could cause harm or violate human rights. This overhaul, cited as a response to evolving AI landscapes and geopolitical factors, allows Google greater flexibility in pursuing potentially sensitive projects. The revised principles emphasize human oversight, due diligence, and mitigation of unintended consequences while aligning with international law and human rights. However, the changes have sparked employee concerns about a diminished commitment to ethical AI development.
Read More
When I first heard about Amazon’s Just Walk Out technology in their Fresh grocery stores, I was intrigued by the idea of skipping the checkout line altogether. The convenience of scanning a QR code upon entering the store seemed like a futuristic shopping experience. However, learning that this advanced technology was actually just a facade for remote workers in India watching and labeling videos of customers shopping left me feeling deceived.
The fact that the cashiers were simply moved off-site and substituted by camera surveillance is unsettling. The idea that someone was watching my every move as I shopped is not only creepy but also raises concerns about privacy and security.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood