In the final days of the 2024 election, a newly formed conservative Super PAC, RBG PAC, launched a $20 million disinformation campaign supporting Donald Trump. The campaign deceptively claimed Trump shared Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s views on abortion, a falsehood designed to sway voters. Funding for this operation was concealed until after the election, ultimately revealed to be a $20.5 million contribution from Elon Musk’s Revocable Trust. This deceptive campaign, expertly timed to avoid pre-election disclosure requirements, highlights the increasing use of shadowy tactics in modern political advertising.
Read More
Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner is suing Tesla founder Elon Musk over his super PAC’s intention to give out $1 million a day to voters in key battleground states in the 2024 election. The case, which initially began in the local Court of Common Pleas, has been moved to a federal court on Musk’s request. Krasner’s attorneys are contesting the transfer, requesting the matter be returned to a state court as the case involves state law issues.
Read More
Musk’s attorneys filed documents Wednesday night in the U.S. District Court in Philadelphia, a federal court, requesting the matter be moved to their jurisdiction – and out of the local Court of Common Pleas. “We will proceed to federal court and we will address the issues there, and seek to have the matter remanded back to the state court. The DA is also charged with protecting the public from interference with the integrity of elections,” Krasner said in a statement after the civil suit was announced.
Read the original article here
Read More
The recent news of the Philadelphia District Attorney suing Elon Musk and his super PAC over a $1 million sweepstakes has resonated with me on multiple levels. It is a striking example of the contrast between the powerful elite and the average citizen, a disparity that is becoming increasingly difficult to overlook in our society. As I reflect on the implications of this lawsuit, I am filled with both skepticism and a hope for accountability.
The trial date set for June 2034 feels like an eternity away, rendering the lawsuit almost a toothless gesture in the wake of Musk’s stature and resources.… Continue reading
Watchful eyes across America have been scanning the headlines, and I find myself caught in a whirlwind of reflection after the recent news broke that Elon Musk’s super PAC didn’t announce its “daily” lottery winner as promised. The omission came swiftly on the heels of a warning from the Justice Department, indicating that their multi-million dollar giveaway might skirt the boundaries of legality. It’s bewildering and, frankly, disheartening to consider how deeply the lines between fair game and illicit maneuvering have been blurred in our political landscape.
There’s a certain arrogance in the air surrounding Musk and his operations—an unsettling presumption that the rules don’t apply the same way to him as they do to the average citizen.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood