Days before a US airstrike on Iranian nuclear sites, Iran reportedly threatened to activate sleeper cells within the US as retaliation. This threat, communicated to President Trump, did not prevent the attack. Following the strike, senior Iranian military officials vowed a decisive response, hinting at potential actions against US troops. Further, Iran reportedly prepared to close the Strait of Hormuz, a move with significant global economic implications.
Read More
The US is urging China to dissuade Iran from closing the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial waterway for global oil transport. This request comes after a series of actions by the US, leaving many to question the wisdom of this approach. The situation is fraught with geopolitical complexities, and the US’s reliance on China to mitigate the consequences of its own actions highlights a concerning level of vulnerability.
The request to China seems particularly ironic given the recent history of strained US-China relations. The US has seemingly made a concerted effort to improve ties with China only recently, potentially indicating a shift in foreign policy priorities.… Continue reading
Iran’s declaration that it is considering “all options” in response to what it deems “outrageous” US strikes is a statement fraught with uncertainty and potential for escalation. The immediate reaction to such a declaration is to question what options Iran truly possesses. Its recent losses of air superiority and the vulnerability of its leadership cast a shadow over its capacity for a direct military response. The fact that its calls for support from Russia, China, and even the Houthis appear to have gone unanswered speaks volumes about its current isolation.
The very real limitations of Iran’s military options shouldn’t be mistaken for complete helplessness, however.… Continue reading
The reported approval by the Iranian parliament to close the Strait of Hormuz has sent ripples of speculation and concern across the globe. The news, initially reported by Reuters citing Press TV, presents a dramatic scenario with potentially far-reaching consequences. However, the practicalities of such a move and its geopolitical implications are significant.
The immediate question that arises is how Iran could effectively achieve such a closure. A full-scale blockade would require substantial naval power and the ability to withstand the almost certain response from the international community. This would likely involve a major military confrontation, with potentially devastating consequences for all parties involved.… Continue reading
Following a US airstrike on Iranian nuclear facilities, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei vowed unprecedented retaliation against the United States. His representative, Hossein Shariatmadari, called for immediate action, including a missile strike on US naval forces in Bahrain and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Iran’s foreign minister condemned the attack as a violation of international law, reserving the right to defend its sovereignty. While Iran assures its citizens of safety, the atomic agency declared its continued pursuit of nuclear development.
Read More
A significant deployment of over two dozen U.S. Air Force KC-135R and KC-46A tankers across the Atlantic has raised concerns regarding the escalating Israel-Iran conflict. This unusual mass movement of refueling assets lacks a clear explanation beyond several potential scenarios, including increased support for Israel’s operations, direct U.S. military intervention, countering a potential Iranian Strait of Hormuz closure, or establishing a robust air bridge for transporting assets to and from the Middle East. The deployment may reflect preparations for various contingencies, or it could represent a significant shift in U.S. policy in the region. Further investigation is needed to determine the exact purpose of this large-scale mobilization.
Read More
I’m intrigued and somewhat apprehensive about the potential outcome of Biden’s response to the recent attack in Jordan. While I don’t perceive Iran as a nuclear-armed state, there may be intelligence that the public isn’t privy to. This raises questions about the possibility of a major war and the resulting global instability. Although some may fear a large-scale conflict, I see parallels between previous proxy wars involving Iran, the US, and the Soviet Union during the heightened tensions of the 1980s. Therefore, I don’t view this situation as an imminent catastrophic escalation.
One concern is that a US retaliation could lead to Iran rapidly developing and testing a nuclear weapon, altering the dynamics of the conflict.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood