Stephen Miller, a known immigration hardliner, berated Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials for insufficient deportations during a May 21 meeting. He demanded a tripling of arrests, reportedly threatening the jobs of those who failed to comply. This occurred despite the current administration’s deportation rate mirroring that of the Biden administration, falling short of Trump’s campaign promises. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, also present, adopted a more conciliatory approach.
Read More
The New York Times reports that Attorney General Pam Bondi’s tenure is characterized by a significant departure from the traditional independence of the Department of Justice. Instead, the White House, particularly Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, is alleged to be directing the department’s agenda, with Bondi acting primarily as a messenger executing White House directives. This has led to criticism from both sides of the political spectrum, with some questioning her effectiveness and others defending her actions as necessary to counter a perceived “liberal” workforce. Bondi’s frequent appearances on Fox News, while boosting her profile, have also drawn criticism for prioritizing media appearances over departmental duties. Ultimately, her performance as Attorney General is viewed as highly performative and subservient to the White House.
Read More
Stephen Miller’s past criticisms of government intervention in drug pricing, including referring to such policies as “communist” and labeling Kamala Harris as “Comrade Kamala,” have resurfaced following President Trump’s executive order implementing “Most Favored Nation” pricing. This policy, which aims to drastically lower prescription drug costs by referencing prices in other countries, directly contradicts Miller’s previously stated positions. Miller’s silence on the order is notable given his outspoken opposition to similar Democratic proposals. The stark contrast highlights the inherent irony of the Trump administration’s expansion of government influence in the pharmaceutical sector.
Read More
Rep. Matt Gaetz, during a July 2024 visit to El Salvador’s notorious mega-prison, CECOT, proposed using the facility to house migrants to Stephen Miller, a top Trump advisor. This suggestion, subsequently relayed to Trump, involved a deal brokered by the State Department with El Salvador’s President Bukele, despite human rights concerns surrounding CECOT. Trump expressed support for the plan, even suggesting the imprisonment of U.S. citizens in CECOT. The plan’s implementation has already resulted in the deportation of individuals to the prison, prompting legal challenges and sparking outrage.
Read More
White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller stated the Trump administration is considering suspending habeas corpus to circumvent judicial blocks on deportations. Miller cited the Constitution’s provision allowing suspension during invasion, arguing that court overreach in cases like the blocking of Venezuelan TPS terminations necessitates this action. He contends that courts are undermining the executive and legislative branches, citing recent Supreme Court rulings on deportation and habeas corpus challenges as evidence. The administration views the suspension of habeas corpus as a potential solution to these perceived judicial obstacles.
Read More
White House advisor Stephen Miller confirmed the administration is considering suspending the writ of habeas corpus, citing the Constitution’s suspension clause applicable during invasion or rebellion. This aggressive action would escalate efforts to deport individuals without allowing legal challenges, mirroring past attempts to utilize the Alien Enemies Act. Federal judges have consistently rejected the administration’s “invasion” justification, emphasizing the clause’s requirement of a demonstrated threat to public safety. This move follows a pattern of defying court rulings against the administration’s deportation policies.
Read More
Stephen Miller’s recent statement regarding the Trump administration “actively looking at” suspending habeas corpus is deeply troubling. The very suggestion of such an action strikes at the heart of fundamental American legal principles and raises serious concerns about the potential for authoritarian overreach. The idea that the government could detain individuals indefinitely without due process, without the right to challenge their imprisonment before a court, is a stark departure from the established rule of law.
This proposed suspension, even if framed within the context of the Constitution’s provision allowing for such action in cases of rebellion or invasion, is alarmingly vague.… Continue reading
Lawmaker Mike Lawler’s town hall meeting was disrupted by constituents protesting his stance on presidential authority regarding tariffs, leading to several attendees’ removal by security personnel. This incident, captured on video and photos, follows a previous contentious town hall where Lawler faced accusations of dishonesty. Lawler, a Republican representing a swing district, is notable for continuing to hold these public forums despite the increasingly hostile responses. The use of state troopers, rather than private security, in removing protestors has prompted calls for an investigation.
Read More
Olivia Troye, a former homeland security advisor, described Stephen Miller as a “horrible human being” due to his extremist views and bullying behavior in White House meetings. Troye cited Miller’s derogatory comments about immigrants and his use of “lawfare” to advance his agenda. Miller, a key architect of Trump’s hardline immigration policies, is currently a deputy chief of staff and is reportedly a leading candidate for National Security Advisor. Trump himself has publicly praised Miller’s influence and importance within the administration.
Read More
Consumer preference for higher-quality, American-made goods, exemplified by a hypothetical choice between a potentially unsafe Chinese doll and a safer, better-constructed American doll on Amazon, is highlighted. However, the argument rests on a contradiction: lowering regulations and production costs, while simultaneously promoting superior American quality, suggests a potential trade-off between safety and affordability. This apparent paradox underscores a key point in the argument for the economic benefits of reduced regulations.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood