During a recent interview, Stephen Miller alluded to the possibility of the Trump administration ignoring a federal judge’s order, hinting at the president’s supposed “plenary authority” under Title 10 of the US Code, a claim swiftly removed from the aired broadcast. The author disputes Miller’s assertion, emphasizing that plenary power, which Miller seemed to be suggesting, is synonymous with absolute and unchecked power, and such authority is not granted to the President under US law. Miller’s rhetoric, as exemplified in a speech, frames those opposed to the administration as enemies, setting the stage for a potential conflict. The piece concludes with a warning that Miller, as a key figure and ideologue, may pose a greater threat to democracy than Trump himself.
Read More
During a recent CNN interview, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller appeared to suggest President Trump possesses “plenary authority,” which implies the president’s power is essentially limitless. This comment, made while discussing the deployment of federal troops to cities, caused Miller to abruptly pause, and the interview was subsequently edited to remove the phrase. Legal experts note that “plenary authority” isn’t explicitly granted to the president under the US Code, and Judge Immergut previously ruled the president’s justifications for deploying troops were baseless. Some analysts suggest Miller’s statements reveal the administration’s view that Trump can unilaterally decide when to invoke emergency powers, and that this is an intentional strategy to polarize the public and consolidate power.
Read More
During a CNN interview, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller stated that President Trump had “plenary authority” regarding the deployment of the National Guard in Oregon, before abruptly cutting himself off. This statement has raised concerns due to the implications of plenary authority, which grants a single official absolute power, contradicting the U.S. system of separation of powers. The use of such authority has drawn comparison to dictators and prompted protests against perceived overreach by the Trump administration. Miller’s silence and the subsequent lack of further clarification have left the meaning behind the statement unclear.
Read More
During a CNN interview, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller raised questions when he stated that President Trump had “plenary authority” concerning the deployment of the National Guard in Oregon before abruptly cutting himself off. “Plenary authority” implies absolute power, conflicting with the U.S. system of separation of powers and checks and balances. Miller’s comment, and subsequent silence, came amid discussion of a legal challenge to the administration’s use of the National Guard, and comparisons to authoritarian rule. The incident led to speculation about the implications of the comment and whether Miller realized the ramifications of his words.
Read More
During a CNN interview, White House aide Stephen Miller paused mid-sentence while discussing the President’s authority to deploy National Guard troops, leading to speculation of a technical glitch or a deliberate stop. Miller’s use of the term “plenary authority” sparked controversy, as it suggests the president has broad, potentially limitless power. Despite the on-air issue, the interview resumed with Miller re-asserting the President’s authority under Title 10 of the U.S. Code to deploy federal resources, though he emphasized the administration would abide by the judge’s ruling. This incident raised questions and drew criticism, particularly concerning the scope of executive power in domestic troop deployments.
Read More
During a CNN interview, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller reportedly claimed President Trump had “plenary authority” regarding the deployment of the National Guard. This statement, which suggests the president has absolute control, was made while discussing the administration’s response to court orders concerning the National Guard in Portland, Oregon. The comment was then followed by an apparent pause and omission of the word “plenary” in a later response. This assertion of broad presidential power has generated controversy, given the historical reluctance to involve the federal military in civilian affairs and the legal checks and balances in the US government.
Read More
In a recent CNN interview, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller claimed the U.S. has never tolerated “unlawful riotous assemblies” at federal buildings, drawing immediate criticism. Critics pointed out that the Trump administration had pardoned over 1,500 individuals involved in the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot. This contradiction emerged amidst debates over the deployment of federal agents in Portland, Oregon, where local officials dispute the extent of violence compared to the administration’s claims. A federal judge, in a ruling against the Trump administration’s actions in Portland, agreed that the president had overstepped his authority.
Read More
As the current administration leverages the shutdown, the publication is stepping up to provide unbiased reporting and maintain accountability. They are dedicated to delivering fact-based journalism, and they need ongoing support to continue their work. Previous support has been instrumental in strengthening the newsroom, especially during challenging times, and they now call for further backing. The publication is grateful for their readers and hopes they will contribute again to help them keep the truth in focus.
Read More
During a recent social media livestream, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez suggested that the best way to counter Trump administration officials, such as Stephen Miller, is to ridicule them, particularly focusing on their “insecure masculinity.” She asserted that humor is a potent tool to dismantle movements built on such foundations. Ocasio-Cortez’s remarks came amidst her ongoing engagement with supporters and following interactions with figures like Miller, who recently engaged in a heated exchange with Representative Dan Goldman. She also dismissed claims from Republicans.
Read More
During a Fox News appearance, Stephen Miller responded to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Instagram comments, in which she criticized his height and labeled him a “clown.” Miller called Ocasio-Cortez a “trainwreck” in response to the congresswoman’s remarks, which were played for him live on air. He also stated that her television appearances negatively impact the Democratic Party’s approval ratings. Ocasio-Cortez responded on X, expressing amusement at the segment.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker
AOC’s Stephen Miller Takedown: Fox Plays It Back & He Melts Down
As the current administration leverages the shutdown, the publication is stepping up to provide unbiased reporting and maintain accountability. They are dedicated to delivering fact-based journalism, and they need ongoing support to continue their work. Previous support has been instrumental in strengthening the newsroom, especially during challenging times, and they now call for further backing. The publication is grateful for their readers and hopes they will contribute again to help them keep the truth in focus.
Read More