White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller condemned a recent ruling that halted President Trump’s deployment of National Guard soldiers to Portland, Oregon. Miller asserted the President’s authority as commander-in-chief, claiming local law enforcement failed to protect ICE officers from “terrorist assault.” U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut, a Trump appointee, ruled against the deployment, stating the President’s decision was “untethered to the facts,” and issued a temporary restraining order. The case is set to continue with a trial date scheduled for October 29th, as the President has deployed soldiers to other Democrat-led cities in recent months.
Read More
A White House official inadvertently revealed plans to deploy the 82nd Airborne Division to Portland while using Signal in a public space. The official, a top deputy to Stephen Miller, discussed the deployment with other officials, including an advisor who stated that the deployment would likely generate significant headlines. Ultimately, the administration sent National Guard soldiers to Portland instead. This incident follows a previous breach of secure communication earlier in the year, adding to the scrutiny surrounding the administration’s communication practices.
Read More
The article argues that powerful figures like Stephen Miller and Elon Musk, who hold sway over government and the world, are actually “losers” who constantly reveal their insecurities. Despite their success, these individuals display a penchant for victimhood and petty behavior, exemplified by the reaction to Charlie Kirk’s assassination, with calls for firings and public shaming. This is further illustrated by examining Miller’s past and present actions, including his appropriation of Nazi propaganda and displays of insecurity, suggesting a desperate attempt to appear as a figure of power. The author believes these actions prove that these leaders are more fragile and pathetic than powerful.
Read More
Following a post from Governor Newsom’s press office labeling Stephen Miller a “fascist,” Republican Representative Derrick Francis Van Orden called for Newsom’s arrest, deeming the post “domestic terrorism” based on 18 U.S. Code § 2331. Van Orden’s critique cited the post’s alleged intent to influence government policy through intimidation. Ironically, the term “fascist” has been used by Miller himself to describe opponents and the Democratic party. Newsom’s office, however, has remained unyielding in its criticism.
Read More
In response to California Governor Gavin Newsom’s criticism of the Trump administration’s immigration policies, former White House official Stephen Miller claimed Newsom’s rhetoric “incites violence and terrorism.” Miller’s statement suggests an effort to broaden the definition of incitement, potentially criminalizing protected political speech that criticizes the administration. This comes amid other moves by the Trump administration, like the designation of “antifa” as a “domestic terrorist organization,” which critics fear will be used to target those who label the government as “authoritarian”. These actions, and similar statements by other officials, indicate a growing trend of equating criticism with violence, raising concerns about free speech protections.
Read More
Governor Gavin Newsom expressed concern that the Trump administration intends to exploit the assassination of Charlie Kirk to undermine democratic institutions. Newsom specifically criticized remarks made by Stephen Miller, who labeled the Democratic Party a terrorist organization and vowed to dismantle networks responsible for political violence. Newsom argues that the administration’s focus on crime and safety is a pretext for a larger effort to threaten millions of Americans. The governor’s warning follows Trump’s condemnation of “radical left lunatics” in the wake of Kirk’s death.
Read More
Following the assassination of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk, Vice President JD Vance hosted a special episode of Kirk’s podcast, advocating for a government crackdown on left-wing organizations. Vance stated his intention to dismantle the network he claims encourages violence. Senior Trump advisor Stephen Miller, also a guest on the show, echoed calls for a strategy to combat left-wing violence, expressing focused anger and a commitment to action. The episode also featured appearances from prominent figures such as Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Tucker Carlson, and White House officials.
Read More
The White House has issued a denial regarding rumors that Stephen Miller, a key policy advisor to President Trump, plays with dolls. This denial came in response to a Rolling Stone profile detailing the backroom gossip and nicknames surrounding Miller within the West Wing, stemming from his time on Capitol Hill. Despite being a loyal advisor, Miller is reportedly the subject of both mockery and admiration among Trumpworld figures, with even Trump himself allegedly insulting him. This is evident from the unflattering nicknames that have been associated with him.
Read More
Stephen Miller, a key figure in the Trump administration’s immigration policies, faces criticism and mockery, stemming from his time in Congress to his current White House role. A Rolling Stone profile details his influence and alleges he acts as a shadow boss over several agencies. Miller is accused of spearheading controversial initiatives, including the building of detention camps and increased immigration arrests. Furthermore, the article highlights accusations of past animosity towards Latinos and his dismissal of stories of families separated by immigration enforcement.
Read More
Following Donald Trump’s 2024 election watch party, Stephen Miller, a key architect of the Trump administration’s immigration policies, celebrated what he perceived as a personal victory. With Trump’s renewed blessing, Miller has become an extremely powerful unelected official, shaping policies and executive actions with unprecedented authority. This influence has resulted in aggressive enforcement measures, including mass deportations, family separations, and the potential suspension of constitutional rights, reflecting Miller’s vision of a “republic of fear.” Miller’s actions and the harsh enforcement have led to devastating consequences for families, yet Miller views this as a necessary and amusing part of his work.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker
Are We Being Ruled by the World’s Biggest Losers?
The article argues that powerful figures like Stephen Miller and Elon Musk, who hold sway over government and the world, are actually “losers” who constantly reveal their insecurities. Despite their success, these individuals display a penchant for victimhood and petty behavior, exemplified by the reaction to Charlie Kirk’s assassination, with calls for firings and public shaming. This is further illustrated by examining Miller’s past and present actions, including his appropriation of Nazi propaganda and displays of insecurity, suggesting a desperate attempt to appear as a figure of power. The author believes these actions prove that these leaders are more fragile and pathetic than powerful.
Read More