Special Counsel Jack Smith resigned from the Justice Department on January 10th, following the submission of a two-volume report on his investigations into Donald Trump. The report, detailing findings on Trump’s post-2020 election conduct and handling of classified documents, is currently subject to legal disputes regarding its release. Trump’s legal team and co-defendants’ attorneys are attempting to prevent portions of the report’s public dissemination, citing potential prejudice to their cases. The Justice Department has pledged to release the report, but has committed to delaying the public release of the classified documents portion until the relevant case concludes.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith and his team plan to resign before President-elect Donald Trump takes office, as the Justice Department generally does not charge sitting presidents with crimes. The looming question is whether Smith’s final report, detailing his charging decisions, will be made public before Inauguration Day. The report must be submitted to Attorney General Merrick Garland, who has the authority to release it. Although Smith’s office was moving forward with the election interference case against Trump, the Supreme Court’s ruling that Trump has immunity for some acts as president has hampered the investigation. Additionally, a case concerning classified documents was dismissed in July but remains on appeal.
Read More
Donald Trump’s two federal criminal cases, stemming from his attempt to overturn the 2020 election and his possession of classified documents, are set to be dropped due to the long-standing precedent that a sitting president cannot be prosecuted for federal crimes. While this decision may protect the Department of Justice as an institution, it will likely be used by Trump to claim that the charges against him were politically motivated, further weaponizing the justice system against it. To counter this, Special Counsel Jack Smith should memorialize the cases in writing, including all evidence and testimony, forcing Trump’s team to publicly end them and exposing their actions. This will allow the public to see the full extent of Trump’s alleged criminal behavior and hold him accountable for his actions.
Read More
The audacity of Donald Trump, proclaiming that he would “fire” special counsel Jack Smith “in two seconds” if he were elected again, is nothing short of alarming. This isn’t just a throwaway remark. It’s a chilling indication of his intentions and a stark reminder of the fragility of our democratic institutions. In a society that prides itself on law and order, the thought of a former president openly discussing the dismissal of someone pursuing justice against him feels like a direct assault on the very principles that bind us as a nation. It’s baffling to watch a significant portion of the electorate support a figure who so brazenly promotes corruption and undermines accountability.… Continue reading
The bombshell special counsel filing that reveals new allegations of Trump’s desperate efforts to overturn the 2020 election results is both shocking and appalling. It paints a picture of a man willing to go to extreme lengths, including engaging in criminal behavior, to hold onto power. The court filing outlines Trump’s private criminal conduct, working with a team of co-conspirators to disrupt the electoral process through fraud and deceit.
The fact that Trump, even in the face of mounting evidence, continued to perpetuate baseless claims of voter fraud is a direct assault on democracy. The filing details instances where Trump was corrected by those around him, yet chose to ignore the truth and instead continued to push his false narrative.… Continue reading
Special counsel Jack Smith’s decision to appeal the dismissal of the Trump classified documents case should be making headlines. This appeal, which is expected to be heard in the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in Atlanta, marks a critical moment in a case shrouded in controversy and legal intricacies. With the likelihood of the appeal reaching the U.S. Supreme Court, the stakes are incredibly high.
The role of special prosecutors has a long history, dating back to 1875. However, the lack of regulations surrounding their use raises questions about the extent of their authority. The recent dismissal of the case by Judge Aileen Cannon has raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest and the possibility of bad-faith decisions.… Continue reading
It is truly disheartening to see the recent decision by Judge Aileen Cannon to dismiss the classified documents indictment against former President Donald Trump. This ruling, handed down on Monday, raises significant concerns about the integrity of our judicial system. In her 93-page order, Cannon argued that the appointment of special counsel Jack Smith violated the Constitution, a claim that seems to be a thinly veiled attempt to shield Trump from facing accountability for his actions.
The fact that this case was dismissed on such flimsy grounds is deeply troubling. It is clear that Cannon’s decision was politically motivated, rather than based on legal merit.… Continue reading
A federal judge recently dismissed the indictment against former President Trump involving the mishandling of classified documents. The judge argued that the appointment of special counsel Jack Smith violated the Constitution, citing concerns over the role of Congress in such appointments. This decision has sparked outrage and disbelief among many Americans, including myself. It raises questions about the integrity and fairness of our judicial system, particularly when it comes to high-profile and politically sensitive cases.
The ruling by Judge Cannon, who was a Trump appointee, has been scrutinized for its timing and potential political motivations. Some have speculated that this decision was a deliberate move to benefit Trump and give him a boost during the Republican National Convention.… Continue reading
Any objective observer can see the blatant bias and corruption displayed by Judge Cannon in the case of Trump’s request to declare the special counsel’s appointment invalid. The fact that she is entertaining challenges to the special counsel, especially after being slapped down by the 11th Circuit previously, raises serious concerns about her ability to uphold justice objectively. It is alarming to witness a judge blatantly favoring the defendant, delaying the trial, and allowing threats against law enforcement agencies like the FBI and DOJ to go unchecked.
There is a clear pattern of behavior by Judge Cannon that indicates she is not operating within the bounds of judicial ethics.… Continue reading
The recent revelation from the Biden Transcript has certainly shed light on some questionable claims made by the Special Counsel regarding the President’s memory. The fact that Biden was never even asked about the timing of his son’s death, yet certain individuals tried to spin it as if he couldn’t remember, raises serious concerns about the credibility and intentions of those involved in the investigation.
It’s evident that there was a clear attempt to discredit President Biden by questioning his memory when, in reality, he immediately recalled the month and day of his son’s death. The manipulation of facts for political gain is not only disheartening but also damaging to the public’s perception of the truth.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker