For a limited time, readers can enjoy unlimited access to high-quality Financial Times journalism across all devices for just $1 over four weeks. This introductory offer then transitions to a $75 monthly subscription. Subscribers can cancel at any point during the trial period. The offer provides complete digital access to the FT’s content.
A motion to impeach South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol failed due to a ruling party boycott, resulting in an insufficient number of votes (195 out of the required 200). The national assembly speaker declared the vote invalid. Despite this setback, the opposition plans to introduce a new impeachment bill on December 11th, with a vote scheduled for December 14th. The ruling party, however, seeks a more “orderly” resolution to the crisis surrounding President Yoon’s controversial declaration of martial law.
Facing intense pressure, including from within his own party, President Yoon Suk Yeol apologized for his attempt to impose martial law but refused to resign. His actions, which were rescinded hours after their declaration following parliamentary defiance, prompted calls for his impeachment. Despite some within his party advocating for his resignation, Yoon stated he would accept responsibility and leave the political situation’s resolution to his party. Investigations into insurrection and abuse of power are underway, with potential severe penalties for those involved.
South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol narrowly survived an impeachment vote after a governing party boycott, with only one lawmaker voting against the motion. The vote followed Yoon’s controversial, short-lived declaration of martial law, sparking widespread protests and calls for his resignation. Although he apologized and stated there would be no repeat attempt, a subsequent impeachment vote is scheduled for December 11th. Even within his own party, calls for his resignation are mounting, leaving his future uncertain despite surviving the initial impeachment attempt.
Following a failed attempt to impose martial law, South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol issued a public apology, acknowledging the significant shock and disruption caused to the nation. He attributed his actions to desperation and accepted responsibility, stating he would not evade legal or political consequences. Facing an imminent impeachment vote and calls for his resignation from within his own party, Yoon declared there would be no further attempts to invoke martial law. The president’s actions, deemed reckless and undemocratic, have triggered widespread condemnation and a political crisis.
Following President Yoon Suk Yeol’s short-lived declaration of martial law, the leader of his ruling party, Han Dong-hoon, reversed his previous stance and now supports impeachment. This shift follows revelations that Yoon ordered the arrests of prominent politicians in addition to the martial law declaration. Han expressed fears of further radical actions by Yoon, jeopardizing South Korea’s safety. The impeachment vote is imminent, with the opposition close to securing the necessary two-thirds majority.
During this week’s martial law operation, Lt. Gen. Kwak Jong-keun refused an order from then Defense Minister Kim Yong-hyun to forcibly remove lawmakers from the National Assembly. The General deemed this order illegal and chose to disobey it, citing his own judgment. He also prohibited the distribution of live ammunition to his troops due to concerns over excessive force. This act of insubordination was undertaken despite the General’s awareness of potential consequences.
Following President Yoon Suk Yeol’s declaration of martial law, South Korean lawmakers, aided by their staff, successfully resisted the military’s attempt to seize the National Assembly. Viral footage depicts Ahn Gwi-ryeong, a party spokesperson, physically confronting soldiers, highlighting the widespread public opposition. Despite the dramatic images, Ahn downplayed her role, emphasizing the collective effort to prevent the imposition of military rule. The president’s actions spurred a move by opposition lawmakers to begin impeachment proceedings.
A bill to impeach President Yoon Suk Yeol has been submitted to South Korean Parliament by six opposition parties, with a vote scheduled for November 6-7. The impeachment follows President Yoon’s controversial declaration and subsequent swift revocation of martial law, a decision made amidst intense domestic political turmoil. Should the impeachment bill pass, the Constitutional Court will review the matter. The opposition has also demanded President Yoon’s resignation. This action comes after accusations of harsh leadership from both opposition and members of his own party.
South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol’s attempted coup, undertaken due to political gridlock and unpopularity, was swiftly thwarted by mass protests and a unanimous National Assembly vote. His actions, including the declaration of martial law and deployment of troops, revealed his authoritarian tendencies and undermined his already low approval ratings. The incident highlights the increasingly autocratic nature of Yoon’s presidency, contradicting the image of a democratic leader promoted by the U.S. in its strategy to counter China. Ultimately, the South Korean people prevented not only a domestic power grab but also potentially averted a dangerous escalation of regional tensions.
John Q. Hosedrinker