House Republicans passed a budget resolution enabling massive cuts to Medicaid and SNAP, prompting widespread constituent outrage and calls for town halls to explain the proposed cuts. The resolution, while omitting explicit mention of Medicaid, directs committees to find over $1 trillion in cuts to these programs, effectively targeting them for significant reductions. Despite GOP claims of targeting only “fraud, waste, and abuse,” experts predict draconian cuts impacting tens of millions. This action follows a pattern of unpopular cuts, with polls showing strong opposition even among Trump voters.
Read More
The House Republican budget resolution, passed despite opposition from Democrats and one Republican, initiates a process to drastically cut programs like Medicaid ($880 billion) and SNAP ($230 billion). These cuts will fund proposed tax cuts overwhelmingly benefiting the wealthy. Critics argue the resolution prioritizes the interests of wealthy donors over constituents, while Republicans misleadingly claim the resolution doesn’t explicitly mandate these cuts. The plan, however, represents a first step towards enacting sweeping tax cuts and is already facing significant opposition and criticism due to its potential negative impacts on vulnerable populations.
Read More
The House Rules Committee advanced a Republican budget resolution along party lines, setting the stage for a House vote. This budget proposes deep cuts to Medicaid and SNAP, potentially harming millions of low-income Americans, to fund substantial tax cuts primarily benefiting the wealthy. Independent analyses project millions losing healthcare coverage and food assistance, exacerbating food insecurity and economic hardship. Democrats uniformly oppose the resolution, highlighting its contradictory nature given Republicans’ previous promises to lower costs, and facing significant hurdles to passage due to internal disagreements within the Republican party and opposition in the Senate.
Read More
The House Republican budget resolution proposes $4.5 trillion in tax cuts favoring the wealthy, offset by $2 trillion in cuts to programs like Medicaid and SNAP. These cuts, totaling $2 trillion in “mandatory spending” over a decade, would disproportionately harm low-income families and are intended to fund the tax breaks. Critics argue this prioritizes the rich while jeopardizing healthcare access and food assistance for millions. The resolution directs committees to enact specific spending cuts to achieve these targets.
Read More
Donald Trump’s return to power on January 20th necessitates continued robust reporting. HuffPost remains committed to providing fearless coverage of the new administration. However, unrestricted access to this critical information requires reader support to maintain a paywall-free model. Readers can contribute financially or simply create a free account to help sustain this vital public service.
Read More
President-elect Trump’s proposed tax cuts, heavily favoring the wealthy, would be offset by cuts to social safety net programs like Medicaid and SNAP. Advisers are considering stricter work requirements and spending caps for these programs, potentially impacting millions of low-income Americans. This plan would exacerbate existing inequality, as the tax cuts would disproportionately benefit the richest 5%, while the cuts to social programs would harm the poorest. The proposed changes include increased Medicaid eligibility checks and limitations on SNAP benefits, risking the loss of healthcare and food assistance for many vulnerable families.
Read More
To offset the massive cost of extending the 2017 tax cuts, Congressional Republicans are exploring significant changes to Medicaid and SNAP. These potential changes include imposing new work requirements and spending caps on both programs, despite evidence showing such measures are ineffective at boosting employment. Further discussed is limiting the President’s authority to adjust SNAP benefits, potentially saving tens of billions but significantly impacting food assistance for millions. These proposed cuts, however, fall far short of covering the projected cost of the Republican tax agenda, which overwhelmingly favors the wealthy and corporations.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker