Pete Hegseth, a Pentagon official, is under investigation for using a private Signal chat to discuss sensitive military operations, including upcoming Yemen strikes, with his wife, brother, lawyer, and other aides. This involved sharing detailed information, such as flight schedules, prior to the March 15th airstrikes. This is the second such incident involving Hegseth and Signal, following a previous leak to The Atlantic’s editor. The Pentagon denies any classified information was shared, while Hegseth’s former staff members allege a cover-up and widespread dysfunction within the department.
Read More
The New York Times’ report detailing Defense Chief Hegseth’s second instance of sharing war plans via an unsecured Signal chat is, frankly, astounding. Four out of twelve individuals in the group chat have already come forward, a fact that speaks volumes about the gravity of the situation and the potential for further leaks. The sheer audacity of this continued behavior is staggering, especially given the initial incident and the lack of any meaningful consequences. This isn’t just a careless mistake; it’s a blatant disregard for national security protocols and the potential repercussions.
The fact that this individual still holds his position is almost unbelievable.… Continue reading
A recent YouGov poll reveals that a significant majority of Americans (74 percent) view the leak of a Signal chat detailing a Trump administration’s Yemen airstrike plan as a serious issue, surpassing concern over Hillary Clinton’s private email server. The Signal chat, published by *The Atlantic*, allegedly included classified information shared by officials on an unsecure platform, prompting comparisons to Clinton’s email controversy. This incident has sparked criticism and potential legal ramifications under the Espionage Act, leading to a lawsuit filed by American Oversight. Reactions from involved officials ranged from denials to accusations of a “witch hunt.”
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood