In response to calls for his dismissal, Hegseth stated his focus remains on issues the Department of Defense considers priorities. The Department refuted national security concerns raised regarding Hegseth’s conduct, attributing negative reporting to disgruntled former employees. The DoD emphasized the absence of classified information breaches and reiterated its commitment to executing the President’s agenda.
The CIA reviewed former Director John Ratcliffe’s Signal account on March 31st, following reports of a journalist’s unauthorized access to a sensitive group chat. The review, documented in a court filing related to a lawsuit against White House officials, revealed that the chat contained only administrative information and not the substantive messages discussing U.S. military plans in Yemen. These messages, allegedly shared on March 24th, prompted bipartisan criticism and legal action alleging violations of federal record-keeping laws. The absence of sensitive information on the reviewed account remains a key point of contention.
A White House investigation revealed that National Security Advisor Mike Waltz inadvertently included journalist Jeffrey Goldberg in a Signal group chat discussing Yemen strikes. This resulted from a series of errors beginning with Goldberg emailing the Trump campaign, his number being forwarded to Waltz, and ultimately being saved incorrectly on Waltz’s phone. Though Trump briefly considered firing Waltz, he ultimately decided against it, partly to avoid giving the Atlantic satisfaction. The incident prompted a forensic review, which highlighted the use of Signal for sensitive discussions due to a lack of secure alternative platforms.
Pentagon acting Inspector General Steven Stebbins will review Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s use of the Signal app to discuss a Yemen military strike, including whether it violated DoD policies and classification rules. The review, prompted by Senatorial request, also examines other officials’ use of the app for official communication. The investigation follows the inadvertent inclusion of a journalist in a Signal group chat detailing the strike’s timing. Concerns center on the potential compromise of classified information and non-compliance with records retention laws, despite administration claims no such information was shared.
Gabbard and Ratcliffe’s alleged repeated lies regarding Signal chat messages have ignited a firestorm of controversy. The situation has exposed a significant breach of trust, highlighting the critical need for accountability within government. This isn’t just about messaging apps; it’s about the integrity of those entrusted with power. The lack of serious bipartisan investigation is particularly troubling, raising questions about whether partisan politics are overshadowing the pursuit of justice.
The perceived lack of serious action on this matter reflects a deeper issue – a seeming unwillingness to hold powerful individuals accountable. This apparent double standard, where past investigations into similar issues were pursued vigorously but this one seemingly ignored, is creating a climate of distrust.… Continue reading
National Security Adviser Mike Waltz’s use of Signal to discuss sensitive matters, including peace negotiations and military operations with cabinet officials, has raised concerns about national security and record-keeping. The app’s auto-delete function violates federal record preservation laws, prompting a lawsuit and bipartisan calls for investigation. While Waltz and other officials deny sharing classified information, the incident highlights vulnerabilities in secure communication at the highest levels of government. The potential for intelligence breaches and the ongoing legal challenges threaten Waltz’s position.
Signal chat records must be preserved, a federal judge has ordered the Trump administration. This isn’t just about one specific conversation; it’s about a broader pattern of behavior that raises serious questions about accountability and the rule of law. The judge’s order underscores the gravity of the situation, highlighting the potential for the administration to deliberately obstruct justice by deleting evidence.
Signal chat records must be preserved, the judge insists, because they are potentially relevant to ongoing legal proceedings. The fact that the administration might have used a platform like Signal, known for its end-to-end encryption and disappearing messages, suggests a conscious effort to evade official record-keeping and oversight.… Continue reading
Former CIA Director John Ratcliffe defended his use of the Signal messaging app for discussing an impending Yemen military strike, blaming the Biden administration for permitting its prior use, a claim the White House denied. Ratcliffe testified he was unaware of classified details being shared in the group chat, which included several top Trump administration officials and, inadvertently, a journalist. The chat, concerning a military operation, violated intelligence community advisories against using Signal due to security vulnerabilities. Several officials refused to clarify whether they used personal or government phones for the communication.
Chief Judge James Boasberg, recently criticized by President Trump for blocking the deportation of alleged gang members, will preside over a new lawsuit. This case challenges the administration’s use of a private messaging app, Signal, to discuss sensitive military operations, a practice deemed unusual by intelligence experts. The lawsuit, filed by American Oversight, alleges violations of federal record-keeping laws. The defendants include several high-ranking national security officials. This latest assignment further highlights Boasberg’s prominent role in high-profile cases involving the Trump administration.
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood