Trump’s recent stunt with the Bible isn’t brilliant – it’s a clear sign of desperation. As someone who claims to be a good Christian, Trump’s actions to sell Trump-branded Bibles are not only tacky and disrespectful but also manipulative. It’s evident that he’s using religion as a tool to appeal to his base and make a profit.
The fact that nearly a third of the donations received by Trump’s political organization have gone to legal bills is concerning. It raises questions about the integrity of his motives and the transparency of his fundraising efforts. Trump’s attempt to funnel donations from churches to bypass the Johnson amendment is not a noble cause but rather a strategic move to manipulate the system for personal gain.… Continue reading
As a soldier, the honor of receiving an award for bravery and sacrifice is undoubtedly a moment of validation and pride. So, when Ukrainian soldier Yulia Mykytenko rejected the award after the church annulled her fellow gay soldier’s medal, it speaks volumes about the strength of camaraderie and solidarity among troops. Mykytenko’s powerful statement, “It was my first award. It was valuable to me. But I do not need an award from an institution that does not fully understand what it is like to give up one’s life and, in anticipation of death, defend people and freedom,” encapsulates the essence of sacrifice and the importance of recognition from those who truly understand the sacrifices made by soldiers.… Continue reading
As someone who values the principle of the separation of church and state, I am deeply troubled by the recent ruling of the Alabama Supreme Court that cited the Bible in classifying fertilized eggs as children. This decision not only goes against the fundamental idea of keeping religion out of the legal system but also raises significant concerns about the erosion of reproductive rights and personal freedoms.
I find it alarming that a judicial body would refer to religious texts to justify a legal ruling, especially in a country that prides itself on the Constitution’s promise of freedom of religion. Are we now living in a theocratic dictatorship where religious beliefs dictate our laws?… Continue reading
As I read the headline about the bill to ban displays of Satan in public property moving forward in the Senate, I couldn’t help but roll my eyes. It seems like yet another example of right-wing politicians disregarding the principles of the U.S. Constitution. In just 25 words, this bill manages to violate three separate clauses of the First Amendment. It’s truly impressive how they can be against the constitution while claiming to be its biggest defenders.
What strikes me as particularly amusing is the fact that the bill explicitly targets displays of Satan, rather than the broader Satanic Temple. It’s as if they have no idea that the Satanic Temple actually uses a statue of Baphomet as their symbol, not Satan himself.… Continue reading
I recently came across an article that caught my attention. The headline read, “Suspect charged with hate crime for destroying Satanic Temple display at Iowa Capitol.” As I delved deeper into the details, I couldn’t help but feel a mix of emotions ranging from frustration to satisfaction. The suspect, Michael Cassidy, a former congressional candidate, made statements indicating that he destroyed the display due to the victim’s religion. It’s ironic how he was taken down by his own words.
What intrigued me further was the fact that Cassidy had raised over $84,000 for his legal defense. It is baffling to witness the support he has garnered from nearly 2,000 individuals.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood