Senate Parliamentarian

Senate Rulekeeper Thwarts Key Provisions in Revised Bill

Senate rulekeeper deals blows to revised ‘Big, beautiful bill’ – well, that’s a headline that certainly sets the stage, doesn’t it? It seems the meticulously crafted – or perhaps, the hastily assembled – plans for this “Big, beautiful bill” are hitting some unexpected turbulence. The Senate’s rulekeeper, the Parliamentarian, is wielding their power and striking down provisions that don’t quite align with the established rules of the game. It’s a fascinating – and often frustrating – process to watch unfold.

The core of the issue seems to be with provisions specifically added to benefit Alaska and Hawaii, particularly concerning Medicaid payments.… Continue reading

GOP Plan to Sell Federal Lands Violates Senate Rules

The Senate parliamentarian has blocked a Republican plan to sell over 3,200 square miles of federal land, a proposal by Senator Mike Lee intended to generate revenue and spur development by transferring public lands to states or other entities. This plan faced opposition from within the Republican party, as well as Democrats and environmental groups, who argue it would harm clean water, wildlife, and public recreation. Senator Lee plans to revise the proposal, potentially limiting sales to land near population centers. The proposal and its opposition highlight a continued debate over the control and use of public lands in the West.

Read More

GOP Provision Granting Trump King-like Powers Violates Senate Rules

Senate Republicans’ proposed tax bill included a provision requiring exorbitant bonds for emergency court orders against the federal government, effectively barring most lawsuits challenging administration actions. The Senate parliamentarian ruled this provision violated budget reconciliation rules, deeming it unrelated to budget matters. This decision, coupled with unified Democratic opposition, virtually ensures the provision’s removal from the bill. Republicans’ attempts to justify the provision, claiming a lack of constitutional or statutory authority for national injunctions, were refuted. The ensuing debate highlights a clash over the balance between executive power and judicial oversight.

Read More