The New Biden administration rule aims to end the so-called ‘gun show loophole’. As someone who has frequented gun shows and understands the process of purchasing firearms, I can attest to the fact that dealers at these shows are required to conduct background checks, just like they would at their brick-and-mortar stores. The misconception surrounding the ‘gun show loophole’ seems to stem from private sellers, who may not be subject to the same regulations. However, the majority of transactions at gun shows involve licensed dealers who follow stringent guidelines to ensure compliance with the law.
The idea that background checks infringe upon Second Amendment rights is a common argument against stricter gun obtaining laws.… Continue reading
As I dive into the recent ruling by a federal judge affirming that illegal immigrants can possess guns under the Second Amendment, my mind races with thoughts and questions. The intricacies and nuances of constitutional law come to light as we delve into the debate surrounding this controversial decision. The Constitution, often referred to as the bedrock of American society, uses the language of “citizens” and “people” in different contexts. Where it employs the term “people,” it encompasses everyone, not just citizens. Could this be the key to unlocking the rights of all individuals, regardless of their legal status within the United States?… Continue reading
Being invited to speak to students at Kent State University’s Turning Point USA Chapter about the importance of the Second Amendment seemed like an opportunity for Kyle Rittenhouse to share his perspective. However, it quickly turned into a confrontation that he was clearly not equipped to handle. Watching the video of him storming off stage after being confronted by students highlights the fact that without a weapon in hand, he appears to be nothing more than a coward.
The backlash and criticism that Rittenhouse faces are not surprising given the circumstances that led to his notoriety. It is hard to comprehend why someone acquitted of murder would be celebrated, especially by the political right.… Continue reading
The news of a suspect barricaded in a New Jersey home after killing three people in a Philadelphia suburb hits too close to home. Literally hearing the helicopters hovering above for hours brings a chilling realization of the horror that has unfolded. The fact that all the victims are women, including his stepmother, 13-year-old sister, and the mother of his children, speaks volumes about the targeted nature of this heinous crime. It makes you wonder – how could someone act so violently towards their own family members?
In the midst of such tragedy, the issue of gun violence rears its ugly head once again.… Continue reading
As a concerned citizen and someone who believes in the basic principles of justice and safety, I cannot help but feel outrage at the recent incident in Texas where deputies shot a woman mistaken for an intruder. The bodycam footage that surfaced reveals a harrowing situation where law enforcement officers, who are supposed to serve and protect, instead endangered the life of an innocent individual.
The immediate response of these deputies to unload their weapons without properly assessing the situation is not only alarming but also a blatant display of excessive force. The fact that they fired multiple rounds, striking a woman who was not an intruder but a resident of the apartment, is deeply troubling.… Continue reading
interpretation? Yeah, that sounds like Hawaii rightly rejecting the Supreme Court’s gun nonsense.
It’s no surprise that Hawaii’s Supreme Court has had enough of the Supreme Court’s games. The highest court in the land has a serious legitimacy problem. It’s become a partisan circus, where justices twist themselves into positions to push their own agendas.
The idea of “originalism” sounds nice in theory, but when it comes to the real world, it falls apart. How can the Supreme Court argue whether someone attempting to start an insurrection is protected by the 14th Amendment’s insurrectionist clause? It’s clear as day that oath breakers cannot hold office again, unless Congress says otherwise.… Continue reading
The Hawaii Supreme Court recently made headlines for quoting a line from the TV series “The Wire” in a ruling on gun rights. The quote, “The thing about the old days, they the old days,” was used to emphasize that the culture and norms of the past should not dictate contemporary life. While some have criticized this approach, I believe that it raises important questions about the interpretation of the Constitution and the relevance of historical context.
One of the main questions that arises from this ruling is whether the argument can be applied to other amendments in the Bill of Rights or if it is limited to the Second Amendment.… Continue reading
As a gun owner, I never thought I would see the day when I would be required to have liability insurance just to exercise my constitutional rights. However, it seems that this day may be coming sooner than I expected, with the introduction of a Maryland bill that would force gun owners to get $300K liability insurance in order to wear or carry a firearm.
At first glance, the idea of requiring insurance for gun owners may seem reasonable. After all, if you are going to carry a weapon, it would be smart to have insurance to protect yourself legally. One of my close friends has a concealed carry license in Illinois, and he always carries a card in his wallet along with his insurance information.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood