The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has mandated that its physicians and scientists require pre-approval from political appointees before publishing in medical journals or speaking publicly. This directive, issued following the publication of a critical article in the New England Journal of Medicine, requires coordination with the VA’s public affairs office for all media engagements. The policy, while claimed to be longstanding, is seen by critics as censorship, particularly given concurrent efforts to restrict scientific research funding and publication. The authors of the article, which highlighted the negative impact of VA budget cuts on veterans’ healthcare, reported receiving support from colleagues despite the administration’s actions.
Read More
RFK Jr.’s threat to bar government scientists from publishing in leading medical journals represents a deeply troubling development. It signals a potential chilling effect on scientific discourse and a concerning disregard for established norms within the scientific community. The very notion of preventing qualified researchers from disseminating their findings in reputable journals undermines the principles of open inquiry and peer review that are foundational to scientific progress.
This action, if carried out, would severely restrict the flow of vital information and impede crucial advancements in medical research. The potential consequences extend far beyond individual scientists, affecting public health and the global scientific landscape.… Continue reading
In a recent NOAA briefing, researchers omitted any mention of the link between January’s record high global temperatures and human-caused greenhouse gas emissions, a departure from previous practices. This omission occurred despite the briefing acknowledging record-high temperatures and despite direct questions about the role of climate change. The head of NOAA’s monitoring branch cited factors such as reduced air pollution and cloud cover as potential explanations, but this explanation fails to account for the overall warming trend. This silence comes amidst increased scrutiny of US scientific agencies under the Trump administration and a broader effort to downplay the role of climate change in government reports and communications.
Read More
The USDA’s directive to remove mentions of climate change from public websites is a deeply troubling development. It represents an alarming attempt to erase a scientifically established reality from public discourse, a move that undermines efforts to address the impending climate crisis and jeopardizes the well-being of countless individuals and communities. The sheer audacity of this action suggests a deliberate effort to downplay the severity of the situation and, perhaps, to prevent any meaningful policy responses.
This blatant disregard for scientific consensus is particularly egregious given the significant impact climate change is already having on agricultural practices and food security. The USDA, an agency responsible for supporting and regulating agriculture, should be at the forefront of addressing climate change’s impacts, not actively suppressing information about it.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood