The National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) filed a lawsuit against President Trump’s “Schedule F” executive order, arguing it violates civil service law by enabling the dismissal of career employees without sufficient justification. The union contends the order circumvents congressional intent and constitutes an improper political loyalty test. This action follows other legal challenges to Trump’s efforts to reshape the federal workforce, including the Department of Government Efficiency initiative. The NTEU also alleges that Trump violated the Administrative Procedure Act by disregarding established procedures for altering regulations. This marks the second legal challenge from the NTEU regarding Schedule F.
Read More
Experts predict that President Trump’s administration will initially target specific civil servants for dismissal, using them as examples before potentially enacting mass layoffs. This strategy leverages the “Schedule F” executive order, reclassifying certain federal employees as at-will employees lacking typical civil service protections. While mass firings are possible, the administration might instead encourage resignations through the threat of Schedule F and relocation of government jobs, potentially leading to an exodus of experienced personnel. This approach, however, presents legal complexities, particularly regarding veterans’ appeal rights and the potential erosion of institutional knowledge. Ultimately, the Trump administration will need to balance its desire for rapid change with potential legal challenges and political ramifications.
Read More
Downsizing the federal workforce faces significant hurdles, including robust civil service protections and collective bargaining agreements. Proposed solutions like Schedule F, while impacting policymaking roles, offer limited fiscal savings. Ultimately, only Congress possesses the authority to drastically restructure the federal government, a power theoretically within the reach of the current Republican majority. However, any such endeavor risks being largely duplicative of existing proposals and ultimately unproductive.
Read More
President-elect Trump plans to dismiss attorneys who worked on Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigations into his handling of classified documents and the January 6th Capitol riot, many of whom are career professionals typically protected from such actions. Simultaneously, he intends to form teams to investigate alleged 2020 election fraud, despite a lack of evidence. Trump justifies these actions by claiming the Department of Justice was weaponized against him, and intends to reinstate executive order Schedule F to facilitate the removal of government employees. Legal experts, however, note that reinstating Schedule F could face significant legal challenges.
Read More
A top union leader warns that Donald Trump’s return to office will likely result in widespread harassment, intimidation, and corruption within the US federal government. This is fueled by Trump’s and his allies’ support for mass firings of civil servants and the abolishment of agencies, potentially utilizing the controversial Schedule F executive order to remove civil service protections from thousands of employees. This action would reverse over 150 years of merit-based hiring practices established by the Pendleton Act, undermining employee protections and increasing the risk of corruption. The anticipated implementation of Schedule F, central to the rightwing Project 2025 plan, threatens to significantly weaken unions and impair the government’s ability to function effectively.
Read More
With President-elect Trump’s return, a chilling effect has settled over the federal workforce, many fearing a repeat of his first term’s attacks on civil servants. Trump has promised to reinstate Schedule F, a 2020 executive order that would allow for mass firings of nonpartisan employees, replacing them with loyalists. This could fundamentally alter the federal workforce by returning to the “spoils system” of the late 1800s, where political affiliation dictates employment. The potential impact extends beyond Washington D.C., threatening the livelihoods of federal employees across the country, and creating a chilling effect that discourages independent service. While unions are preparing legal challenges, the future of the federal workforce under a Trump presidency remains uncertain, with concerns about mass firings, relocation of agency offices, and a government efficiency commission headed by Elon Musk.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker