This article profiles Chechen and Belarusian volunteers fighting with the Ukrainian Foreign Legion, highlighting their experiences in past conflicts and their perspectives on the ongoing war. Veterans like Benor, who fought in the Second Chechen War, and Stare, a Belarusian exile, share their reasons for joining the Ukrainian army, emphasizing Russia’s broken promises and the ongoing threat to their homelands. Their experiences underscore a deep distrust of Russia and a belief that only Ukraine’s continued resistance will prevent a similar fate from befalling other nations. The piece uses their stories to illustrate the long-term consequences of Russian aggression and the determination of fighters to prevent further expansionist moves.
Read More
Countries across the globe are sending a resounding message to Ukraine: “You are not alone,” even as the United Nations adopts a neutral stance on the ongoing war. This neutrality, however, is being viewed by many as a failure to condemn the aggressor and a tacit endorsement of Russia’s actions. The perception is that such neutrality only serves to benefit the aggressor, allowing them to continue their campaign with minimal international repercussions.
The UN’s decision is seen by some as a moment of profound political weakness, a failure to effectively address a blatant violation of international law and human rights. There’s a strong sense that the organization has once again demonstrated its ineffectiveness, echoing past failures to prevent and resolve major international conflicts.… Continue reading
Scholz firmly rejects the notion of a “dictated peace” being imposed on Ukraine, a stance that underscores the deep unease rippling through Europe following a surprising call between Trump and Putin. This unexpected conversation has sent shockwaves across the continent, highlighting the precariousness of the situation and the anxieties surrounding potential concessions that could undermine Ukraine’s sovereignty.
The call itself has raised serious concerns about the potential for a weakened Western position in negotiations. The perception that the US might be softening its stance towards Russia, or even inadvertently aiding Putin’s agenda, is deeply unsettling for European leaders already grappling with the long-term implications of the conflict.… Continue reading
Russia’s outright rejection of NATO peacekeeping troops in Ukraine, citing the risk of “uncontrollable escalation,” is a predictable yet frustrating response. Their argument hinges on the idea that a NATO presence would somehow destabilize the region further, despite the fact that Russia’s invasion is the very root of the instability. This feels less like a genuine concern for peace and more like a thinly veiled attempt to prevent any international oversight of their actions in Ukraine.
The claim of “uncontrollable escalation” rings hollow, considering the countless instances of Russia escalating the conflict itself. Their actions, from the initial invasion to ongoing attacks on civilian infrastructure, have consistently demonstrated a disregard for international norms and a willingness to stoke conflict.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood