On the third anniversary of Russia’s invasion, the UN General Assembly rejected a U.S.-proposed resolution for ending the war that omitted mention of Russian aggression, instead approving a Ukrainian resolution demanding Russia’s immediate withdrawal. While the Ukrainian resolution passed, support was lower than in previous votes, highlighting diminished international backing. The U.S. abstained from voting on the amended version of its own resolution, reflecting tensions between the U.S. and Ukraine stemming from recent diplomatic initiatives. This outcome underscores the ongoing divisions within the international community regarding the conflict and the challenges in achieving a peaceful resolution.
Read More
The United States’ vote against a UN resolution condemning Russia’s aggression in Ukraine is a startling development, prompting widespread international condemnation and raising serious questions about the future of US foreign policy. The resolution, which overwhelmingly passed with 93 countries voting in favor and only 18 against, called for the return of occupied Ukrainian territories. This US stance places it alongside Russia, Belarus, and a number of other countries widely considered pro-Moscow, a grouping that seems profoundly at odds with traditional US alliances and values.
This decision is being described as a dramatic shift in US foreign policy, a 180-degree turn that some observers characterize as a betrayal of long-standing commitments to international norms and the defense of democratic principles.… Continue reading
Addressing world leaders, President Zelensky emphasized the impossibility of a swift peace deal with Russia, citing 25 ceasefire violations since 2014—a list he personally provided to President Trump. He warned against negotiations that exclude Ukraine and fail to secure concrete security guarantees, echoing concerns that a premature deal would embolden Russia. Trump’s recent diplomatic overtures to Moscow, coupled with his attacks on Zelensky’s legitimacy and pressure for resource concessions, fuel these anxieties. Zelensky stressed that lasting peace requires balanced diplomacy and robust security assurances.
Read More
The third anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine was marked by a visit from European leaders to Kyiv, who reaffirmed their support with a new aid package and further sanctions against Russia. This summit occurred against the backdrop of strained US-Ukraine relations, following President Trump’s remarks echoing Kremlin propaganda and questioning US aid levels. Despite this, Ukrainians remain defiant, highlighting their nation’s transformation and increased independence. European leaders emphasized their substantial financial contributions to Ukraine, exceeding those of the United States.
Read More
After three years of brutal warfare, Russia’s economy is reeling. Extensive fiscal stimulus, sky-high interest rates, persistent inflation, and the weight of Western sanctions have created a perfect storm of economic hardship. The country’s resources are stretched thin, leaving it vulnerable and desperately seeking relief.
This precarious situation, however, presents an unexpected opportunity. President Trump’s apparent eagerness to broker a swift resolution to the conflict in Ukraine, seemingly prioritizing speed over the involvement of European allies and a fair assessment of the situation, could inadvertently deliver a significant economic lifeline to Russia. His approach, which appears to disregard Ukraine’s perspective and frames the 2022 invasion as Ukraine’s fault, could easily be interpreted as a concession to Moscow’s demands.… Continue reading
Britain’s announcement of further sanctions targeting individuals with Kremlin links represents a significant escalation in its support for Ukraine. This move, seemingly long overdue for some commentators, aims to directly pressure the Russian government by targeting those perceived as enabling or benefiting from its actions. The timing is crucial, given ongoing concerns about the waning of international support for Ukraine and the persistent threat of Russian aggression.
The selection of individuals for these new sanctions is clearly a topic of considerable public debate. Many online comments highlight specific individuals they feel should be included, ranging from prominent political figures to business leaders.… Continue reading
Amidst a record-breaking Russian drone attack on Ukraine, killing at least three and destroying infrastructure, Ukraine is nearing a rare earth minerals agreement with the U.S. This attack, the largest since the use of Iranian drones began, coincided with growing concerns over shifting U.S. foreign policy under President Trump, who has signaled a potential thaw in relations with Russia. President Zelenskyy expressed fears that a rapid resolution pushed by Trump could leave Ukraine vulnerable, while Trump’s remarks suggesting Ukraine initiated the conflict have caused alarm. A Trump-Putin meeting is reportedly being planned.
Read More
Prime Minister Starmer emphasized the UK’s unwavering support for Ukraine, asserting that caving to threats would be unacceptable. He stressed that a peace deal failing to prevent future Russian aggression would be disastrous, urging the US to provide strong security guarantees for Ukraine. Starmer highlighted the importance of Ukrainian involvement in negotiations and the need for continued firm, fair action. He also underscored the link between Ukrainian instability and global economic challenges.
Read More
Readers are encouraged to submit news tips to The Daily Beast. The publication welcomes information from all sources. Submissions can be made through a designated online portal. This ensures a confidential and secure process for sharing information. The Daily Beast actively seeks to uncover important stories through reader contributions.
Read More
Prime Minister Trudeau and President Trump discussed the ongoing war in Ukraine, with the latter expressing a desire for peace and suggesting a potential summit with Putin. The White House readout emphasized alignment on ending the conflict, while omitting the crucial condition that Ukraine participate in any negotiations. This conversation comes amidst concerns among European allies regarding potential reduced U.S. support for Ukraine and ongoing negotiations between Russia and the U.S. without Ukrainian involvement. The two leaders also addressed bilateral issues, including border security and fentanyl trafficking.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood