In response to the ongoing war in Ukraine, President Macron confirmed France’s intention to impose sanctions against Russia. While expressing openness to discussions regarding a shared nuclear umbrella with European allies, he stipulated that France would bear no financial burden for the security of others and maintained sole authority over nuclear arsenal deployment. Macron dismissed seizing frozen Russian assets, citing a lack of legal precedent. He intends to formally detail his plans regarding nuclear cooperation in the coming weeks and months.
Read More
Russia rejected Western demands for a 30-day Ukraine ceasefire, deeming the ultimatum unacceptable and its tone unproductive. This rejection came despite warnings from Germany of impending sanctions if a response wasn’t given by the end of May 12th, a deadline coordinated with European partners. The demand for a ceasefire was part of a strategy, agreed upon at a Kyiv summit, to leverage sanctions for a negotiated truce. While Russia proposed resuming peace talks on May 15th, Western leaders insisted a complete and unconditional ceasefire was a prerequisite to negotiations.
Read More
A proposed amendment to Lithuania’s Law on Citizenship would expand the grounds for revoking citizenship from dual citizens who support “aggressor states” or threaten national security. This builds upon a 2023 law allowing revocation for those posing security risks or publicly supporting threatening states, and extends this to all dual citizens regardless of how they obtained citizenship. The impetus for this change stems from concerns about individuals using Lithuanian citizenship to circumvent sanctions, as exemplified by recent reports involving Russian citizens. The amendment explicitly protects individuals with only Lithuanian citizenship.
Read More
Facing Russia’s continued aggression in Ukraine, Germany and its European partners will initiate preparations for a new sanctions package if a 30-day ceasefire isn’t implemented by Monday’s close. This decision follows a joint demand from several European nations for an unconditional ceasefire beginning May 12th. Spokesperson Stefan Kornelius confirmed that sanction preparations, alongside the development of a 17th sanctions package in Brussels, will commence immediately following the deadline. These actions are occurring concurrently with ongoing negotiations in Istanbul. Failure to achieve a ceasefire will trigger immediate action on the sanctions front.
Read More
During his first Brussels visit, Chancellor Merz urged Russia to commence genuine peace talks and a lasting ceasefire in Ukraine, threatening further sanctions with US and EU partners if Russia fails to comply. This follows a call for a 30-day truce, discussed with President Trump, and consultations with President Zelenskyy, who reported agreement on several key issues. Merz emphasized the need for a lasting truce enabling a peace treaty. The threat of intensified sanctions underscores the international pressure on Russia to end the conflict.
Read More
Following President Trump’s attempts at peace negotiations, Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna advocates for a unified US and European approach to pressure Russia. This pressure should involve intensified sanctions and the seizure of frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine’s reconstruction. Tsahkna emphasizes the need for a strong stance against Putin, citing potential Hungarian obstruction of EU sanctions and suggesting Trump could influence Hungary’s position. Ultimately, he believes that only significant pressure will elicit a meaningful response from Putin.
Read More
A newly signed US-Ukraine economic partnership agreement has heightened concerns in Moscow that Russia’s negotiating leverage regarding the war in Ukraine has diminished. Russian officials reacted contemptuously, viewing the agreement as furthering Ukrainian dependence on the US and potentially hindering Russia’s ability to secure a favorable peace deal. This shift is seen as particularly problematic given internal pressure on Putin to concede, and the potential for increased sanctions if negotiations fail. The agreement is interpreted as solidifying a US-Ukraine alliance, thus eliminating the more Russia-sympathetic approach of the previous Trump administration.
Read More
Following a meeting with US Senator Marco Rubio, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot announced the EU’s preparation of a 17th round of sanctions against Russia, directly blaming Vladimir Putin for obstructing peace in Ukraine. This action coordinates with a US sanctions initiative, and follows a newly signed US-Ukraine agreement on critical minerals, signaling a shift towards economic cooperation alongside continued military aid. Barrot emphasized the need for de-escalation of US tariffs and highlighted the importance of European strategic autonomy within NATO.
Read More
The European Union firmly rejects Russia’s annexation of Crimea, with its top diplomat stating that Crimea is unequivocally Ukrainian territory. Concerns exist regarding a potential U.S. peace plan that may involve concessions to Russia, including lifting sanctions and de jure recognition of Crimea’s annexation. The EU is preparing alternative strategies to maintain sanctions on Russia if the U.S. withdraws support for Ukraine. While acknowledging internal EU divisions and potential for defections, the EU emphasizes the need for unity and continued financial, albeit potentially limited military, support for Ukraine.
Read More
Senator Roger Wicker (R-MS) delivered a Senate floor speech condemning Vladimir Putin’s war crimes in Ukraine, specifically citing the Palm Sunday attack on civilians. He asserted that Putin’s aggression is solely responsible for the ongoing conflict and that any peace initiatives have been rejected by Putin, who consistently violates agreements. Wicker commended the Trump administration for setting a timeline for Putin to choose peace and expressed support for bipartisan efforts, including the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025, to hold Putin accountable. He concluded that Putin has consistently acted in bad faith, breaking promises throughout the conflict.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker