A photograph depicts President Trump reviewing a satirical *New York Post* cover story mocking his recently implemented universal tariffs. The article highlights the significant stock market downturn and China’s retaliatory tariffs, contrasting Trump’s optimistic pronouncements with the negative economic consequences. The *Post*’s typically softer stance on Trump’s actions is noted, suggesting a potential rift between the two given the article’s critical tone. This incident follows other instances of tension between Trump and Murdoch’s media empire, notably regarding critical editorials published in *The Wall Street Journal*.
Read More
The article details a past confrontation between Donald Trump and Rupert Murdoch in the Oval Office, where Trump reportedly berated Murdoch. Despite this public dressing-down, the piece suggests Murdoch ultimately emerged with the upper hand, maintaining significant influence within media circles. This power dynamic highlights the complexities of their relationship and the shifting landscape of conservative media. The lasting impact on both men’s legacies remains to be seen.
Read More
While the exact sum remains undisclosed due to a confidential settlement, Prince Harry’s legal victory against Rupert Murdoch’s News Group Newspapers involved a substantial payout. The settlement concludes multiple lawsuits alleging phone hacking and other privacy violations. This marks a significant win for the Duke of Sussex in his long-running battle against the media conglomerate. The agreement reportedly covers compensation for the suffering inflicted by the illegal activities.
Read More
Prince Harry’s settlement with Rupert Murdoch’s UK tabloids, resulting in “substantial” damages, highlights a deeply disturbing pattern of intrusion into the lives of public figures, particularly the egregious targeting of a child. The news corporation’s apology acknowledges a “serious intrusion” into Harry’s private life between 1996 and 2011, including unlawful activities by private investigators employed by *The Sun*. This admission, however, barely scratches the surface of the sheer scale of the invasion of privacy inflicted upon a young Harry, a fact that makes the situation even more reprehensible. The sheer audacity of spying on a child, let alone for an extended period, is truly shocking.… Continue reading
A Nevada court rejected Rupert Murdoch’s attempt to revise his family trust, which would have solidified Lachlan Murdoch’s control over the media empire. The court determined that Rupert and Lachlan acted in bad faith, aiming to permanently entrench Lachlan’s leadership despite potential negative consequences for the companies and other beneficiaries. This decision maintains the current arrangement, equally distributing control among Rupert’s four oldest children upon his death. Murdoch’s legal team plans to appeal the ruling.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood