As a criminal defense attorney, I am no stranger to legal proceedings and the intricacies of the justice system. However, the recent ruling by Judge Cannon in the case against Trump has left me baffled and deeply concerned. The experts warning of a “nightmare scenario” are not exaggerating, as the implications of this decision are alarming.
Judge Cannon’s dismissal of Trump’s motion based on the vagueness of the Espionage Act is troubling on several levels. While she acknowledged that some of Trump’s arguments warrant “serious consideration,” she ultimately dismissed the vagueness argument without prejudice, leaving the door open for it to be raised again later in the case.… Continue reading
The Supreme Court will hear the Trump presidential immunity argument on April 25th, and the implications of this decision are significant. The debate around whether a president should have absolute immunity has been ongoing, but it is essential to consider the precedent set by US v Nixon, where it was unanimously decided that the President does not have absolute immunity.
The delay in the Supreme Court’s decision is frustrating, especially when there are pending elections that could be impacted by the outcome. It is crucial to recognize that no one, not even the President, should be above the law. Granting immunity to a former President could set a dangerous precedent and undermine the principles of democracy and justice.… Continue reading
As I reflect on the recent statement made by the Mexican president defending his decision to disclose a reporter’s phone number, claiming that the law doesn’t apply to him, I can’t help but feel a sense of disappointment and frustration. In a country where journalists are already one of the most targeted groups, this blatant disregard for the law and the safety of those who work tirelessly to bring truth to light is not only concerning but dangerous.
The fact that a leader would openly admit that he is above the laws that govern the rest of the population raises red flags and erodes any sense of trust or accountability in the government.… Continue reading
Donald Trump does not have presidential immunity, US court rules. This ruling comes as no surprise to me. As an American citizen, it is deeply unsettling to see extremists on the right pushing to treat Trump and his family like royalty. This goes against the very foundation of our country and its laws. The founding fathers explicitly designed our government to prevent the rise of a king or queen, which is why presidential immunity should never be a thing.
Some argue that granting immunity to a president is necessary for their proper functioning. But let’s dissect this argument for a moment.… Continue reading
Megathread: Federal Appeals Court Rules That Trump Lacks Broad Immunity From Prosecution
The recent ruling by the Federal Appeals Court that former President Donald Trump lacks broad immunity from prosecution has sent shockwaves through the political landscape. It’s a decision that many of us have been waiting for, and one that brings us hope for accountability and justice. Finally, the courts are recognizing that no one, not even a former president, should be above the law.
One of the key points highlighted in the ruling is Trump’s constant demand for judges and prosecutors to recuse themselves from his cases, simply because they may not align with his personal agenda.… Continue reading
surprised that such arguments are being entertained. The fact that we even have to address the idea of a president using the full power of their position, including military force, to carry out assassinations without consequence is truly alarming. It’s a blatant disregard for the rule of law and a dangerous sign of the erosion of democratic principles.
The concept of broad immunity and the ability to pardon oneself or others raises serious questions about accountability and the integrity of our justice system. It creates a double standard where those in power can act with impunity, while the rest of society is expected to abide by the law.… Continue reading
Trump says he’s looking for new lawyers on Truth Social amid report he’s not “happy” after $83M loss. It’s no secret that Donald Trump has always had issues with his legal representation. Many have criticized his choice of lawyers, claiming that they are not competent enough to handle his cases. However, the truth is that it’s not the lawyers’ fault that he keeps losing his cases – it’s because he’s guilty.
I can’t help but think that every decent lawyer he comes across probably advises him to settle or plea bargain. But Trump’s ego won’t allow him to accept that he’s in the wrong.… Continue reading
Republicans now say it might be okay to ignore the Supreme Court. As a concerned citizen and observer of American politics, I find this statement deeply troubling. The fundamental principles of our democracy are built on the rule of law and the balance of powers, with the Supreme Court playing a crucial role in upholding these principles. However, it seems that the Republican party is veering further away from its original principles in favor of partisan agendas.
One of the key issues raised is the Republicans’ selective obedience to Congressional subpoenas. They seem to believe that they can ignore subpoenas if they don’t agree with them, yet have no problem issuing subpoenas themselves and expecting them to be obeyed.… Continue reading
European Parliament to Vote on Stripping Hungary of EU Voting Rights
Finally, some action is being taken against Hungary’s Prime Minister, Viktor Orbán, and his incessant obstruction of progress within the European Union (EU). The European Parliament has agreed on a resolution that proposes stripping Hungary of its EU Council voting rights. As someone who has been following the situation closely, I can’t express enough how necessary and overdue this decision is.
The root cause of this resolution can be traced back to Orbán’s veto of the crucial €50 billion financial aid package for Ukraine. This move not only hindered the EU’s efforts to support Ukraine but also demonstrated Orbán’s willingness to use his power to further his own agenda, regardless of the repercussions for the rest of the EU.… Continue reading
Texas Governor Defies Supreme Court Ruling, Continues to Fortify Border with Razor Wire
I am shocked and deeply concerned by Governor Abbott’s decision to defy a Supreme Court ruling and continue fortifying the Texas border with razor wire. It is a blatant disregard for the rule of law, and it sets a dangerous precedent for our democracy.
Abbott’s statement on social media, where he proudly proclaims that the Texas National Guard is “holding the line,” is nothing more than a political stunt that is costing billions of dollars to Texas taxpayers. It raises important questions about whether blue cities and states would be allowed to ignore rulings they don’t agree with, or if this privilege is reserved only for Republicans.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker