As Judge Tanya Chutkan wisely stated, the electoral schedule is not a factor to consider when it comes to moving forward with criminal cases. The law should be applied equally to all, regardless of any impending elections or political agendas. It is refreshing to see a judge prioritize the rule of law over partisan interests and take a stand against maneuvers to delay justice for political gain.
The fact that Trump’s attorney, John Lauro, is attempting to use the impending presidential election as an excuse to delay the case is ludicrous. It is unfair to allow someone to manipulate the legal system for their convenience, especially when they are facing serious allegations of subverting election results.… Continue reading
As I sit here reflecting on the recent news regarding Jack Smith’s appeal potentially leading to the dismissal of Judge Aileen Cannon, I am left feeling a mix of emotions. On one hand, I am heartened by the possibility of accountability finally catching up to someone who has seemingly abused their position of power. On the other hand, I am deeply disheartened by the realization that our justice system may have been compromised by individuals more invested in political allegiances than upholding the rule of law.
The idea that a judge, whose primary duty is to remain impartial and uphold justice, could be swayed by personal bias is deeply troubling.… Continue reading
Judge orders Justice Department to return helmet, spear to ‘QAnon Shaman’
When news broke that a judge had ordered the Justice Department to return the helmet and spear to the ‘QAnon Shaman’, my initial reaction was a mixture of confusion and disbelief. The idea of a man who had played a role in the disturbing events that unfolded on January 6th being reunited with his cosplay accessories seemed frivolous and almost comical. However, upon further contemplation, I came to a realization that this decision, although controversial, is fundamentally grounded in principles of justice and legality.
The notion that the government should not unjustly withhold an individual’s property, regardless of their past actions or beliefs, is one that resonates with me.… Continue reading
The recent decision by the US Supreme Court to decline to halt Trump’s sentencing in the hush money case has sparked a mix of reactions and emotions across the country. Missouri filed a last-ditch effort to stop the sentencing, claiming it infringed on the rights of voters under the US Constitution. However, the justices of the Supreme Court decided not to hear the case, with conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito indicating they would have taken it up.
This move by the Supreme Court highlights the complexities and nuances of our justice system. It signifies a moment where even the three justices appointed by Trump himself opted not to intervene in the sentencing process.… Continue reading
As an individual who values democracy and the rule of law, the recent news of Schumer pushing a bill to strip Trump of court-granted immunity sparked a myriad of thoughts and emotions. The very essence of our democracy relies on the fundamental principle that no one, not even the President, is above the law. So, when the Supreme Court granted Trump absolute immunity for his official acts, it shook the core of our legal system. How can a President be free to overturn an election against the will of the people? It goes against the principles of democracy that our nation was built upon.… Continue reading
The recent Supreme Court immunity ruling allowing presidents to ignore laws is nothing short of a disaster for the democratic fabric of our nation. When I think about the potential ramifications of this ruling, I am filled with a sense of dread and urgency. The fact that this ruling could set a precedent for unchecked executive power is deeply troubling. The thought that our democracy could be eroded by a single decision is frightening.
As I reflect on the potential implications of this ruling, I can’t help but feel a sense of frustration and anger. The idea that future presidents could exploit this ruling to further their own agendas at the expense of the rule of law is deeply disturbing.… Continue reading
As an American citizen, I am deeply troubled by the recent decision made by the Supreme Court. The very foundation of our nation, the idea that Presidents are not Kings, has been upended. The conservative justices, claiming to be originalists, have chosen to ignore history altogether, thereby creating a shocking new precedent: the president is above the law. This ruling is a dangerous step towards turning the President into a monarch, erasing the principles on which the United States was founded.
The concept of a President being above the law is antithetical to the core values of democracy. George Washington himself rejected any idea of being a king, firmly establishing the notion that the United States would never bow to such authoritarian rule.… Continue reading
The recent ruling by the Supreme Court granting former President Donald Trump immunity for ‘official’ acts has sent shockwaves through the American political landscape. As someone who values democracy and the rule of law, this decision is deeply concerning. It raises questions about accountability and the limits of presidential power.
The notion that the President enjoys immunity for official acts, as defined by Chief Justice John Roberts in the majority opinion, seems to be a dangerous precedent. It sets a troubling standard that could potentially shield future presidents from legal repercussions for questionable actions taken while in office. This immunity could embolden leaders to act with impunity, knowing that they are beyond the reach of the law.… Continue reading
This ruling by the Supreme Court is absolutely terrifying. The fact that the President is now officially above the law and can essentially assassinate anyone under the guise of official acts is a blatant attack on democracy and the principles of checks and balances. The idea that an elected official can have you killed for any reason without consequences is a severe blow to our freedom of speech and democracy as a whole.
The implications of this ruling are staggering. The President, and by extension, the Vice President, can now act with impunity, without fear of any repercussions for their actions.… Continue reading
I cannot wrap my head around the logic behind Kristi Noem’s push to pardon the US Capitol attackers to prevent another January 6. It’s like saying, “Let’s release all bank robbers to prevent bank robberies.” The idea is absurd and nonsensical. Criminals need to face consequences for their actions, not be pardoned to potentially repeat their crimes.
Pardoning individuals who attacked the Capitol sends a dangerous message that such behavior is acceptable and will go unpunished. It undermines the rule of law and accountability, which are fundamental principles of justice in any society. How can we expect to deter future attacks if we excuse and pardon those responsible for the violence and chaos that occurred on January 6?… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood