A New York judge rejected Donald Trump’s claim of presidential immunity in his 34 felony conviction, ruling that the actions were personal and not related to his official duties. The judge’s decision, a significant interpretation of Supreme Court precedent, affirmed the conviction based on overwhelming evidence of guilt. Trump’s legal team plans to appeal, leveraging his recent election victory and exploring other strategies to overturn the verdict. These strategies include citing laws regarding presidential transitions and the Justice Department’s policy on prosecuting sitting presidents.
Read More
A New York judge has ruled that Donald Trump is not entitled to immunity from prosecution in the hush-money case. This decision directly addresses Trump’s attempt to leverage claims of presidential immunity to dismiss the 34 felony charges against him. The judge’s rejection of this argument is significant, representing a decisive blow to Trump’s legal strategy. This ruling allows the criminal case to proceed, unburdened by the complexities and potential delays that the immunity claim introduced.
The judge’s decision explicitly rejects the argument that actions taken before Trump assumed the presidency, or during his time in office, automatically shield him from prosecution under the umbrella of presidential immunity.… Continue reading
FBI Director Christopher Wray resigned three years before the end of his term, succumbing to pressure from President Trump. This decision, despite Wray’s prior commitment to impartiality, allows Trump to avoid a public confrontation over his potential firing of Wray and the subsequent appointment of a loyalist. Wray’s resignation is viewed as a normalization of Trump’s governing style and a setback for the FBI’s nonpartisan reputation. This action joins a pattern of conservatives prioritizing loyalty to Trump over adherence to constitutional principles. The departure further erodes the rule of law, setting a concerning precedent for future administrations.
Read More
Following Donald Trump’s reelection, both the Manhattan District Attorney and the New York Attorney General affirmed their intent to proceed with their respective cases against him. The DA argued that Trump’s conviction for falsifying business records does not warrant dismissal due to his presidency, proposing alternative sentencing options such as delaying sentencing or imposing no jail time. The Attorney General rejected Trump’s request to dismiss the $454 million civil fraud judgment, stating that presidential immunity does not apply to such cases involving unofficial conduct. Both legal battles are expected to continue throughout Trump’s term.
Read More
Threatened with jail, Liz Cheney’s condemnation of Trump’s actions underscores a significant clash within the American political landscape. Her outspoken criticism, even in the face of potential imprisonment, highlights the deep divisions and the perceived assault on democratic norms. This situation isn’t simply a political squabble; it represents a broader struggle over the interpretation and application of the rule of law itself.
The threat of jail for Cheney is not just a personal threat; it’s a chilling message to anyone who dares to oppose the former president, regardless of their political affiliation. It raises serious concerns about the potential for political persecution and the suppression of dissent, fundamentally undermining the democratic process.… Continue reading
Judge Royce Lamberth sentenced Philip Grillo, a former congressional candidate, to 12 months imprisonment for his participation in the January 6th Capitol attack. Despite Grillo’s claims of a potential presidential pardon and attempts to delay sentencing, Lamberth emphasized the importance of upholding the rule of law and accountability for those who broke the law that day. The judge refuted misinformation surrounding the Jan. 6th prosecutions, stating that no one was prosecuted for protected speech, only for illegal actions. Lamberth’s sentencing underscored the judiciary’s commitment to justice, independent of political influence.
Read More
During this week’s martial law operation, Lt. Gen. Kwak Jong-keun refused an order from then Defense Minister Kim Yong-hyun to forcibly remove lawmakers from the National Assembly. The General deemed this order illegal and chose to disobey it, citing his own judgment. He also prohibited the distribution of live ammunition to his troops due to concerns over excessive force. This act of insubordination was undertaken despite the General’s awareness of potential consequences.
Read More
President-elect Trump’s nomination of Kash Patel to lead the FBI raises serious concerns. Patel’s lack of qualifications is overshadowed by his demonstrated loyalty to Trump over the rule of law, evidenced by his promotion of election conspiracy theories and threats to pursue perceived enemies. This nomination echoes past abuses of power by the FBI, raising fears of a return to such actions. The choice highlights a disregard for constitutional principles and the potential for politicization of the bureau.
Read More
The dismissals of the federal cases against Donald Trump represent a significant setback for the rule of law, highlighting deep structural and institutional flaws within the system. These failures leave the country vulnerable to the very kind of unchecked presidential power the founders sought to prevent. Expert opinions express concern over the implications for presidential accountability and the long-term consequences for the constitutional order. The dismissals leave momentous questions unanswered regarding presidential immunity and the future of independent investigations.
Read More
Following the 2024 election, President-elect Trump’s actions, including controversial appointments and rejection of fundraising transparency, underscore his disregard for established norms. The subsequent dismissal of the election interference case against him further cemented this trend, prompting concern from legal analysts and commentators. This outcome is viewed as a significant blow to accountability and the rule of law, potentially emboldening lawlessness. The episode also explores the growing influence of Christian nationalism on American society and politics.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood