In a recent legal development, a case challenging the results of the 2024 election has progressed, initiated by SMART Legislation over alleged voting irregularities in Rockland County, New York. The case alleges discrepancies between the number of votes cast for a Senate candidate and the official count, along with statistical anomalies in voting patterns. Judge Rachel Tanguay has acknowledged the legitimacy of the claims and ordered all discovery to be completed within seven months. The plaintiffs have requested extensive data, including voting machine information and records of irregularities from 2020 and 2024 elections, to investigate the matter further.
Read More
As part of the discovery process in a lawsuit questioning the 2024 election’s accuracy in Rockland County, New York, the lead plaintiff has submitted extensive document requests. These requests, along with a series of questions submitted by SMART Legislation, target voting machine information, voter rolls, and security protocols. The lawsuit, which alleges voting discrepancies and statistical anomalies, seeks a full hand recount of ballots. While the County Board of Elections has filed a motion to dismiss, a judge has ruled that discovery must proceed, with a hearing set for September and a trial expected early next year.
Read More
As part of the discovery process, SMART Legislation submitted extensive document requests and questions to the Rockland County Board of Elections regarding the 2024 election results. The requests seek information on voting machines, software, security protocols, and communications with vendors, including software updates. The inquiries also questioned the use of technologies like Starlink’s Direct to Cell service. Furthermore, the lawsuit, with a full hand recount requested, highlights discrepancies in vote counts and statistical improbabilities within the 2024 election data. The next court hearing is a compliance conference set for September 22, 2025, at the Rockland County Courthouse.
Read More
Rockland County, New York, has initiated a legal challenge to the Presidential and Senate election results, citing significant irregularities. The county’s complaint alleges that the official tallies contradict sworn statements from voters who claim they cast ballots for independent Senate candidate Diane Sare, indicating a discrepancy between reported votes and actual votes cast. This discrepancy raises serious questions about the accuracy of the election process within the county.
The challenge extends beyond the Senate race; the presidential election results also present concerning statistical anomalies. The complaint highlights multiple districts where a substantial number of voters selected Democratic Senate candidate Kirsten Gillibrand, yet zero votes were recorded for the Democratic Presidential candidate, Kamala Harris.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood