The right laughs at trans people’s deaths but demands people be sad over Charlie Kirk. This stark contrast, this blatant hypocrisy, reveals a chilling truth: a hierarchy of the value of people’s lives is intrinsic to the authoritarian project. The Republican Party, wielding its power, is actively trying to enforce this hierarchy on everyone. They want us to comply, to accept their warped worldview where some lives are inherently worth more than others.
This insidious agenda manifests in various ways. We see it in the gleeful reactions to the deaths of trans individuals, often accompanied by dehumanizing language and the perpetuation of harmful stereotypes.… Continue reading
Okay, so the central question here, the one Senator Schatz seems to be sidestepping, is: “What f—ing difference does it make?” when it comes to the political leanings of the suspect in the shooting of Charlie Kirk. And honestly, it makes a world of difference. It’s not about some abstract concept of political correctness; it’s about acknowledging a very real and present danger.
The issue isn’t just the act itself. It’s the *context*. It’s the environment, the echo chamber, the constant barrage of inflammatory rhetoric. We have a segment of the population – let’s be frank, a segment of the right-wing – that is being whipped into a frenzy.… Continue reading
Following the murder of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, President Trump announced the suspected gunman had been apprehended and will be honored with the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Trump and other Republicans have used the tragedy to attack the political left, despite the lack of motive or confirmation of the killer’s political affiliation. Mehdi Hasan, editor-in-chief of Zeteo, argued against this framing, pointing out the majority of political violence comes from the right. Hasan expressed hope for the capture of the alleged killer and empathy for Kirk’s family, while also condemning his past rhetoric and anti-immigrant stances.
Read More
The murder of right-wing figure Charlie Kirk, while a tragedy, has been swiftly followed by the right’s attempts to blame the left and weaponize the event to further their agenda. Despite Kirk’s history of making hateful and inflammatory statements, his death is being used to call for persecution of those on the left. Prominent figures are already scapegoating opposing political views. The article highlights the hypocrisy and potential dangers of this response, particularly the tendency to overlook Kirk’s problematic views in favor of a narrative that benefits the right.
Read More
Charlie Kirk, a prominent right-wing commentator and ally of Donald Trump, was recently killed, concluding a career defined by controversial rhetoric. Throughout his career, he made inflammatory remarks on his podcasts, debates, and on college campuses, often aligned with the MAGA movement. His comments frequently included racist, sexist, and exclusionary viewpoints on race, gender, immigration, and religion. Examples of these sentiments were captured by Media Matters for America, showcasing Kirk’s views on sensitive topics.
Read More
On Wednesday, right-wing activist Charlie Kirk was fatally shot at a Utah college event, marking an instance of escalating political violence in the United States. According to Todd Belt, a political management professor, President Donald Trump significantly contributed to this rise in tension. Belt highlighted the substantial increase in threats against US lawmakers, asserting Trump’s actions had exacerbated the situation.
Read More
Following Democratic Socialist Zohran Mamdani’s victory in the New York City mayoral primary, right-wing figures responded with intense Islamophobia. They employed inflammatory rhetoric, including comparing Mamdani to 9/11 terrorists and falsely accusing him of supporting Sharia Law. Influencers and politicians posted hateful content on social media, including AI-generated images and false claims, echoing sentiments reminiscent of the “Ground-Zero Mosque” controversy. This resulted in threats against Mamdani’s life, highlighting the dangerous impact of these Islamophobic attacks.
Read More
In short, Elon Musk and associates, including individuals with alleged neo-Nazi ties, are attempting to seize control of key US government agencies, most notably the Bureau of Fiscal Service. This action constitutes an illegal power grab, potentially jeopardizing the disbursement of trillions in government funds. The acting US attorney for D.C. issued a weak, pro-Musk statement, threatening legal action against anyone interfering with Musk’s efforts, rather than condemning the attempted takeover. This represents a concerning instance of right-wing authoritarianism.
Read More
Following Elon Musk’s pro-immigration stance, a backlash ensued from right-wing figures like Laura Loomer, fueled by nativism and racism. Musk responded by revoking verification badges from prominent critics, escalating the conflict. This controversy highlights the hypocrisy of both sides: anti-immigration conservatives opposing foreign tech workers while tech CEOs exploit low-wage immigrant labor. Trump’s past contradictory positions on immigration leave his current stance unclear, despite a history of xenophobic policies.
Read More
Despite months of relentless claims of widespread voter fraud and warnings of a stolen election, Donald Trump and his allies abruptly shifted their rhetoric on Election Day. As results initially favored Trump, concerns about election integrity disappeared, replaced by self-congratulatory messages. Similarly, far-right channels on Telegram, previously brimming with fraud allegations, fell silent. Notably, Trump himself ceased his accusations, even though he continues to refuse to concede the 2020 election. While some baseless claims about voter fraud emerged on the left, they were not endorsed by Democratic officials and stood in stark contrast to Vice President Kamala Harris’s acceptance of the election results, emphasizing a fundamental principle of American democracy.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker