Retaliatory tariffs

Canada Threatens Retaliatory Tariffs on US Orange Juice and Steel

In response to President-elect Trump’s threatened 25% tariffs on all Canadian goods, Canada is preparing retaliatory tariffs on various American products, including orange juice, toilets, and steel. This response mirrors Canada’s actions in 2018 when similar tariffs were imposed. The proposed Canadian tariffs aim to counter Trump’s economic coercion tactics and his inaccurate claims regarding Canadian resource dependence. High-level Canadian officials have dismissed Trump’s suggestion of Canada becoming the 51st state as a serious negotiating tactic, characterizing it as a distraction from the economic implications of his proposed tariffs.

Read More

Canada Threatens Energy Cut-Off, Retaliatory Tariffs Against US

In response to President-elect Trump’s threat of a 25% tariff on all Canadian goods, Canada is preparing retaliatory tariffs and exploring options to restrict energy exports to the U.S. Ontario Premier Doug Ford explicitly threatened to cut off energy supplies to five U.S. states. A meeting of Canada’s premiers with Prime Minister Trudeau resulted in a commitment to a robust response, including bolstering border security and utilizing various retaliatory measures. The federal government is coordinating with provinces to identify key export products for potential counter-tariffs, and plans to share this strategy with the incoming Trump administration.

Read More

Trump’s Tariff Threat: Devastating Texas?

Donald Trump’s proposed 25 percent tariff on all goods from Mexico and Canada is projected to severely damage the Texas economy, potentially costing the state 370,000 jobs and $46.9 billion in gross state product annually. Economists warn of retaliatory tariffs from Mexico and Canada, further exacerbating economic losses and potentially triggering inflation. This protectionist measure, intended to curb illegal immigration and fentanyl trafficking, is criticized for harming consumers through higher prices and disrupting vital supply chains. The tariffs’ impact on Texas is particularly severe due to its extensive trade relationships with Mexico.

Read More

Mexico Scrambles to Replace Chinese Parts Amid US Trade Threat

Facing accusations of facilitating Chinese goods entry into North America, Mexico is actively working to replace Chinese parts with locally sourced or North American alternatives to secure its position within the USMCA. This initiative, while launched in 2021, faces significant hurdles, mirroring similar challenges in the United States. Simultaneously, Mexico is appeasing concerns from the U.S. and Canada regarding independent regulatory agencies by aligning its reforms with USMCA requirements. The future of the USMCA, while unlikely to be abandoned entirely, remains precarious, potentially subject to prolonged renegotiation or slow attrition due to concerns over Chinese imports.

Read More

Eric Trump’s 30-Second Tariff Gaffe Exposes Economic Ignorance

Eric Trump, appearing on Fox News, threatened Mexico, Canada, and China with tariffs to combat drug trafficking, conflating tariffs with sanctions. His statements echoed his father’s vow to impose significant tariffs on these countries, with Donald Trump specifically mentioning a 10 percent increase on Chinese goods. This action, while framed as targeting foreign economies, is likely to increase costs for American consumers due to hiked prices on imported goods. Economists have widely cautioned against this approach, highlighting the negative impact on American consumers.

Read More

Mexico Threatens Retaliatory Tariffs Against Trump’s Trade Policies

President Sheinbaum responded to President-elect Trump’s threat of 25% tariffs on Mexican goods by suggesting retaliatory tariffs, emphasizing the interconnectedness of US and Mexican businesses, particularly automakers. She acknowledged Mexico’s efforts to curb migration but countered that the drug problem is largely a US issue stemming from domestic consumption and weapon smuggling from the US. She proposed addressing the root causes of migration through increased regional investment, advocating for dialogue and a negotiated solution rather than escalating trade tensions. Despite offering to negotiate, Sheinbaum’s firm stance reflects a significant shift in tone compared to the more conciliatory approach of her predecessor.

Read More