Republican Judge Jefferson Griffin conceded his challenge to North Carolina Supreme Court Justice Allison Riggs’s election victory, declining to appeal a federal court ruling. Griffin’s six-month-long legal battle, involving multiple unsuccessful appeals, aimed to disqualify legally cast ballots. This case, criticized by various groups for potentially setting a harmful precedent, ultimately tested the limits of post-election litigation and raised concerns about future election challenges. A federal judge, ultimately rejecting Griffin’s attempt at retroactive ballot invalidation, cited due process violations.
Read More
Following a near-even split in the 2024 Minnesota House election, Republicans, despite lacking a majority, unilaterally seized control of the chamber. This involved legally questionable challenges to election results, including a lawsuit to invalidate a Democratic victory and a refusal to seat a Democrat who won a subsequent recount. This action, described as a “coup,” mirrors similar attempts to subvert democratic processes nationwide. The legality of the Republican actions is currently being challenged in court, with the expectation of a return to the 67-67 tie.
Read More
Following a contested North Carolina Supreme Court election, Republicans on the court temporarily blocked the certification of Democratic Justice Allison Riggs’s victory. This action, stemming from a GOP challenger’s attempt to invalidate over 60,000 votes, despite Riggs winning by 734 votes after recounts, is seen by Democrats as a blatant attempt to seize power. The move has drawn widespread criticism, with accusations of voter disenfranchisement and undermining democratic processes. The court’s actions raise concerns about the future of fair elections and the potential overturning of the election results.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker