House Republicans unveiled a budget plan including $4.5 trillion in tax cuts, partially offset by $2 trillion in spending cuts, ultimately adding $3 trillion to the national deficit. The plan targets Medicaid and other social safety net programs for significant reductions, with committees responsible for these programs facing substantial savings targets. While the plan uses euphemisms like “work requirements,” the scale of proposed cuts necessitates deep reductions beyond such measures, potentially including per capita caps and enrollment restrictions. This budget prioritizes tax cuts for the wealthy over the protection of social safety nets, despite prior Republican assurances.
Read More
The House Republican budget resolution proposes $4.5 trillion in tax cuts favoring the wealthy, offset by $2 trillion in cuts to programs like Medicaid and SNAP. These cuts, totaling $2 trillion in “mandatory spending” over a decade, would disproportionately harm low-income families and are intended to fund the tax breaks. Critics argue this prioritizes the rich while jeopardizing healthcare access and food assistance for millions. The resolution directs committees to enact specific spending cuts to achieve these targets.
Read More
A Politico report reveals a House Republican budget proposal including $5.7 trillion in cuts over ten years. Key targets include Medicaid, with plans to “equalize payments” and impose “per capita caps,” potentially eliminating coverage for millions. Further cuts to food assistance and clean energy subsidies are also proposed, aligning with previous Republican efforts to curtail government spending. The proposals face significant political hurdles due to the narrow Republican majority and anticipated Democratic opposition.
Read More
In a controversial move driven by efforts to reduce government spending, Republican lawmakers removed funding for the Gabriella Miller Kids First Research Program, jeopardizing crucial pediatric cancer research through 2033. This decision, made during a recent budget reconciliation, eliminated $190 million in funding originally allocated to continue the program’s vital work. The cuts, celebrated by Elon Musk, drastically reduced a comprehensive spending bill, leaving many, including advocates for children’s health, deeply concerned. The elimination of this program, which had bipartisan support and was considered a turning point in pediatric cancer research, raises serious questions about national priorities and resource allocation.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker