Reading about the detailed torture of kids in Ruby Franke’s newly released journal is utterly disturbing. The extent of the abuse and the twisted mentality behind it is beyond comprehension. The fact that these innocent children endured such heinous acts at the hands of their own mother is heartbreaking and enraging. The trauma they suffered will undoubtedly leave lasting scars on their minds and hearts.
The revelation that religious extremism motivated Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt to inflict this horrific abuse only adds another layer of horror to an already unimaginable situation. The belief that such abuse was necessary to teach children how to repent for imagined sins and cast evil spirits out of their bodies is sickening.… Continue reading
As I read about the horrific case of a woman accused of murdering her own three-year-old son in Durham, claiming that the Bible allowed her to cane him, I find myself grappling with a multitude of emotions. The sheer brutality and callousness of the act leave me feeling a mix of anger, sorrow, and disbelief. How could a mother, the very person tasked with nurturing and protecting her child, commit such a heinous crime?
The idea that religious beliefs could be twisted and manipulated to justify such abhorrent behavior is deeply unsettling. The Bible, a book considered sacred by millions around the world, should never serve as a justification for violence and cruelty, especially towards innocent and defenseless children.… Continue reading
I can’t help but feel astonished by the recent controversy surrounding Nikki Haley’s comments on the Alabama Supreme Court embryo ruling. The rush to defend a ruling that classifies single-celled, fertilized eggs as children highlights the challenges of defending the indefensible. As a rational American, I cannot comprehend how personal religious beliefs are being imposed as secular law. The establishment clause seems to be overlooked in this situation, as the religious edict of Christian fundamentalists is prioritized over other major world religions’ beliefs regarding the beginning of life.
Cases like the Alabama ruling are not solely about IVF or abortion; they are strategic moves to challenge SCOTUS on personhood and viability.… Continue reading
It’s a chilling statement to hear a conservative TV host defend Christian nationalism with the argument, ‘If Hitler could use nationalism to do bad things, imagine what a good guy could do’. The mere mention of Hitler in any context elicits a sense of dread, invoking memories of unspeakable atrocities committed in the name of nationalism. The assertion that a ‘good guy’ could somehow leverage nationalism for positive ends is not only misguided but dangerously naive.
Hitler, much like many other dictators throughout history, believed he was the hero of his own narrative. Nobody perceives themselves as the villain; they always see themselves as righteous and just.… Continue reading
Evangelical preachers hold significant influence over their congregations, often using their platforms to spread their political beliefs and rally support for particular candidates. Recently, a preacher made a disturbing statement, claiming that it would be worth having a civil war if it meant getting Trump elected. This kind of rhetoric is not only irresponsible but also dangerous.
It’s disheartening to see individuals who are supposed to promote love, peace, and compassion using their pulpits to incite violence and division. The idea that they are willing to sacrifice lives for a political agenda is deeply troubling. It shows a complete disregard for the well-being of their fellow citizens and a lack of understanding of the consequences of such actions.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood