The Trump administration is escalating its offensive against drug trafficking in the southern Caribbean, warning that traffickers will face consequences, as evidenced by the destruction of a boat allegedly carrying drugs. This action, viewed as a move against Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, has raised questions about the U.S.’s ultimate goal in the region, and whether that goal is regime change. The U.S. aims to exert pressure on Maduro, hoping to incite internal conflict and potentially force his removal, possibly utilizing increased military presence and the targeting of cartels as a means to this end. The administration has already deployed additional military assets and designated cartels as foreign terrorist organizations, granting them the legal authority to take further action, as stated by key figures in the White House.
Read More
Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro has condemned the U.S. deployment of warships in the Caribbean as the greatest threat to the region in a century, accusing the U.S. of threatening its sovereignty and seeking regime change. This response comes amid increased U.S. naval presence, justified by the White House as an anti-drug trafficking operation, although Maduro views it as military pressure. Maduro has vowed maximum preparedness and threatened to declare a republic in arms if attacked, while neighboring Guyana has welcomed the U.S. deployment amidst ongoing territorial disputes.
Read More
During a virtual event with Finland, President Zelensky advocated for regime change in Russia, arguing it is the only solution to prevent future destabilization of neighboring countries. He emphasized that Russia must be coerced into ending the war it started, suggesting the confiscation of frozen Russian assets in the West as a means to achieve this. Zelensky’s comments followed unsuccessful direct talks between Kyiv and Moscow and were made after a devastating overnight attack on Kyiv. While Western nations have been hesitant to fully confiscate Russian assets due to legal and financial stability concerns, Zelensky pushed for their use in supporting Ukraine.
Read More
Although regime change is not an explicitly stated goal, there are indicators of a shifting sentiment towards it. Recent military actions, including potential strikes on key regime figures and symbolic sites, are seen as boosting confidence in the possibility of ousting the current leadership. According to Pahlavi, the current military strategy is pushing the regime to its breaking point, and he believes the regime will collapse by the end of the year. He urges world leaders to firmly back regime change to encourage the Iranian people to take action. However, some European powers are still calling for de-escalation and negotiation, which Pahlavi believes would be a mistake.
Read More
Simultaneous Israeli strikes targeted Evin Prison, known for housing political dissidents, and a Revolutionary Guards’ security headquarters in Tehran. These actions serve as a direct warning to Iran’s leadership. The message conveyed is one of impending regime instability and potential collapse. Israel asserts that the regime is on the brink of losing control.
Read More
Amid heightened U.S.-Iran tensions, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov deemed regime change in Iran “unacceptable,” warning that assassinating Ayatollah Khamenei would trigger devastating regional instability. Russia, a strategic partner of Iran, voiced alarm over potential U.S. escalation in the Israeli-Iranian conflict, emphasizing the unpredictable consequences of such actions. Peskov further cautioned against expanding the conflict, highlighting the already dangerous situation and the potential for further escalation. While declining to specify Russia’s response to a potential strike, Peskov noted that any reaction would originate within Iran itself. Russia’s offer to mediate the conflict has been rejected by both Israel and the EU.
Read More
President Macron cautioned against military intervention in Iran, asserting that regime change through such means would be a grave error. He noted a perceived shift in President Trump’s stance, suggesting increased pressure on Iran. Macron ultimately advocated for a return to diplomatic negotiations with the Iranian government.
Read More
Iran’s recent actions suggest a willingness to abandon its uranium enrichment program, but only under the right conditions. The underlying motivation seems clear: a desire to avoid further escalation with Israel, which views regime change in Iran as a viable option. The escalating cycle of attacks and counterattacks is clearly detrimental to Iran’s military, its security forces, its economy, and public morale. This realization, however belated, has apparently prompted a shift in their strategy.
The current Iranian leadership understands the immense pressure they are under. They recognize that Israel possesses significant air superiority, making any continued pursuit of nuclear weapons incredibly risky.… Continue reading
To access all ET Prime member benefits, users must log in using their ET Prime credentials. If already logged in with a different account, users should log out and log in again with their ET Prime credentials. This ensures full access to member-exclusive content and features. Failure to do so will limit access to the full range of ET Prime offerings.
Read More
Nigel Farage, speaking to a right-wing audience including members of Trump’s inner circle, expressed confidence in winning the next UK general election, hoping it occurs while Trump remains president. This sentiment reflects a deep-seated animosity within the Trump administration towards Keir Starmer’s Labour government, stemming from perceived betrayals and disagreements over policy. The Trump team views Starmer’s leadership negatively, citing issues like the handling of race riots and alleged child grooming cover-ups. Consequently, Trump’s administration is actively exploring strategies to undermine Starmer’s government, potentially including influencing the next UK election.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood