The Trump administration has taken the position that recording Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers in public constitutes a form of violence and should be curtailed. Officials have publicly stated they will prosecute those who record ICE agents, conflating free speech with threats. This has resulted in actions such as strong-arming companies to remove apps tracking ICE activity and targeting protesters and journalists, particularly in Chicago under “Operation Midway Blitz.” A federal judge issued an injunction against the DHS, citing the government’s conduct as shocking. Legal experts and court precedents confirm the First Amendment protects the right to record police in public, yet the administration’s actions demonstrate a pattern of informal repression and an attempt to stifle public accountability.
Read More
Trump’s ICE: They Say Recording is Illegal, But What Does the Law Say?
The Trump administration has taken the position that recording Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers in public constitutes a form of violence and should be curtailed. Officials have publicly stated they will prosecute those who record ICE agents, conflating free speech with threats. This has resulted in actions such as strong-arming companies to remove apps tracking ICE activity and targeting protesters and journalists, particularly in Chicago under “Operation Midway Blitz.” A federal judge issued an injunction against the DHS, citing the government’s conduct as shocking. Legal experts and court precedents confirm the First Amendment protects the right to record police in public, yet the administration’s actions demonstrate a pattern of informal repression and an attempt to stifle public accountability.
Read More