Rand Paul

Paul Condemns White House Over Picnic Snub, Says He’s Lost Respect for Trump

Senator Rand Paul alleges the White House disinvited his family from a bipartisan picnic, citing “petty vindictiveness” and “immaturity.” This action follows Paul’s outspoken criticism of the President’s policy bill, particularly its expansion of the national debt. Paul believes this disinvitation, impacting even his infant grandson, is a politically ineffective attempt to silence his opposition. He further suggests the action may have originated from White House staffers, possibly including Stephen Miller, and demonstrates a concerning decline in political discourse.

Read More

GOP Senators Condemn Trump’s Military Parade, Comparing it to North Korea

Senator Rand Paul, the first Republican senator to publicly oppose President Trump’s planned military parade, criticized the estimated $45 million cost and compared the event’s imagery to authoritarian regimes like North Korea. Fellow Republican senators, including John Kennedy, Roger Wicker, and Susan Collins, also expressed concerns about the parade’s expense, though less vehemently than Paul. The parade, celebrating the Army’s 250th birthday, will feature thousands of troops and various military equipment, potentially necessitating costly street repairs afterwards. Despite these criticisms, President Trump defended the parade’s cost as minimal compared to its value.

Read More

Paul Vows to Oppose $5 Trillion Deficit Increase

Senator Rand Paul vehemently opposes the proposed budget bill, citing a projected $5 trillion increase to the national deficit as his primary reason for dissent. This stance directly contradicts President Trump’s support for the legislation. Paul’s criticism centers on the bill’s inclusion of a substantial debt ceiling increase. The ensuing controversy highlights a significant rift between Paul and Trump.

Read More

Trump Attacks Rand Paul as GOP Budget Bill Faces Senate Defeat

Senator Rand Paul’s opposition to the proposed bill, dubbed a “big growth bill” by its proponents, stems from its inclusion of a debt ceiling increase. Paul has voiced strong disapproval of the substantial debt ceiling hikes proposed in both the House and Senate versions, deeming them unacceptable. He has indicated willingness to support the bill’s remaining provisions if the debt ceiling increase is removed. This stance contrasts sharply with attacks accusing Paul of obstructionism and lacking constructive alternatives. The bill itself faces significant challenges in the Senate and is projected to negatively impact millions of Americans’ healthcare access.

Read More

GOP Senators Rebuke Trump’s “Immoral” Bill, But Will They Vote Against It?

Republican Senators Ron Johnson and Rand Paul voiced strong opposition to President Trump’s budget bill, citing its significant increase to the national debt—projected at $3.1 trillion over ten years by the CBO. Their concerns center on the bill’s tax cuts and increased spending, which they deem fiscally irresponsible. Paul conditionally supports the bill only if the $4 trillion debt ceiling increase is removed, while Johnson called the bill “immoral.” The bill’s passage in the Senate faces uncertainty given the narrow Republican majority and the growing number of GOP senators expressing reservations.

Read More

GOP Cowards Silent on Trump Tariffs

Senator Rand Paul criticized Republican colleagues for privately supporting free trade while publicly remaining silent on President Trump’s tariffs, describing their support as “a quiet whisper.” He highlighted the economic benefits of free trade, citing increased GDP per capita alongside international trade growth over the past 70 years. Online reactions condemned the Republicans’ silence as cowardly and prioritizing political expediency over economic principles. Despite facing considerable opposition, Paul pledged to continue advocating for free markets.

Read More

Rand Paul Denounces Trump’s Gaza Plans: “America First?”

President Trump announced a plan to have the U.S. “take over” the Gaza Strip, rebuild it, and manage its development, a proposal met with mixed reactions. Senator Rand Paul criticized the plan as contradicting the “America First” principle, arguing against another costly military occupation. Conversely, Representative Diana Harshbarger praised the initiative as fulfilling a campaign promise. The plan also drew strong condemnation from Representative Rashida Tlaib, who labeled it “ethnic cleansing.”

Read More

Rand Paul Proposes Elon Musk for House Speaker Amidst Government Shutdown Threat

While the Speaker of the House is not constitutionally required to be a member of Congress, the prospect of electing Elon Musk to the position, as suggested by Representative Paul, remains improbable. Despite this, Musk wields significant influence within the Republican Party, holding a key position in the incoming administration and maintaining close ties to the President-elect, although recent public disagreements highlight potential limitations to this influence. Ultimately, President-elect Trump affirmed that Kevin McCarthy will remain Speaker under certain conditions.

Read More

Rand Paul Suggests Elon Musk for House Speaker

Rand Paul’s suggestion of Elon Musk for House Speaker has ignited a firestorm of debate and disbelief. The sheer audacity of the proposition, coupled with Musk’s already sprawling business empire and controversial public persona, makes it a proposal that seems to defy logic and established norms.

The idea immediately raises questions about the feasibility of such an appointment. Musk’s numerous existing CEO positions alone would seem to preclude his ability to dedicate the necessary time and energy to the demanding role of House Speaker. Could he realistically juggle the responsibilities of running multiple global companies while simultaneously managing the complex legislative process?… Continue reading

Rand Paul Condemns Trump’s Illegal Deportation Plan

Senator Rand Paul supports mass deportation of undocumented immigrants convicted of serious crimes but opposes President-elect Trump’s plan to utilize the U.S. military for this purpose, citing its illegality and the potential for distrust. He advocates for deportation through existing law enforcement agencies like ICE and the FBI, emphasizing the importance of due process. Paul believes employing the military or National Guard for this task is inappropriate and potentially illegal, preferring a less militarized approach to the issue. His stance contrasts with Trump’s proposed use of a national emergency declaration and military involvement to execute mass deportations.

Read More