After a public records request for communications between Governor Greg Abbott’s office and Elon Musk’s companies, Texas officials released nearly 1,400 pages, with the vast majority heavily redacted. The documents, requested by The Texas Newsroom, yielded little information about Musk’s influence, with most pages blacked out, citing concerns like trade secrets and private exchanges. Open government experts highlight this as a symptom of a larger transparency problem in Texas, stemming from court decisions and legislation that have weakened public records laws, making it harder to access information about interactions between government and private entities. The Texas Newsroom is seeking reconsideration of the decision to release heavily redacted information, as the ability to challenge these rulings has become increasingly difficult.
Read More
Judge denies request to exempt Flock footage from Public Records Act, and this ruling, frankly, feels like a necessary dose of reality in a world where surveillance seems to be quietly creeping into every corner. The implications of this decision are far-reaching, and it’s about time someone brought the hammer down on the blurring lines between public and private when it comes to who’s watching us.
The initial argument, as I understand it, centered on the idea that since these cameras are in public spaces, people have no expectation of privacy. Therefore, the footage they capture should be considered fair game.… Continue reading
Texas Governor Greg Abbott is seeking to keep communications with Elon Musk and his companies private, citing concerns about privacy, potential embarrassment, and the impact on open decision-making. The Texas Newsroom requested the emails to examine Musk’s influence in the state. However, the Governor’s office has requested a ruling from the Texas Attorney General to withhold the records, citing the “common-law privacy” exception, and potentially commercial interests. Legal experts like Bill Aleshire are critical of the move. The Attorney General’s office has 45 business days to decide.
Read More
In an effort to track Elon Musk’s influence in Texas, The Texas Newsroom requested emails between Governor Greg Abbott and Musk, as well as representatives from the tech mogul’s companies. Initially, the Governor’s office charged for the records but after payment, claimed all records were confidential. They cited reasons such as private exchanges with lawyers, details about policy-making decisions, and information revealing how the state entices companies to invest. Experts have criticized the use of “common-law privacy” to withhold these records, especially given a recent Texas Supreme Court ruling that provides limited recourse for those seeking these public records.
Read More
A federal judge has ordered the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to release records to a nonprofit watchdog group, citing the agency’s “unusual secrecy” and “unprecedented” authority. Judge Christopher Cooper’s 37-page opinion mandates compliance with Freedom of Information Act requests detailing DOGE’s role in mass firings and federal program disruptions. The ruling, based partly on news reports and social media, addresses concerns about DOGE’s rapid, opaque actions affecting vast swaths of the federal government. While DOGE claims significant cost savings, the lack of transparency prompted the judge to order the immediate release of documents. The decision is appealable.
Read More
Ohio Governor Mike DeWine signed H.B. 315 into law, a bill allowing law enforcement agencies to charge up to $750 for processing video footage requests, raising concerns about public access to crucial information. While DeWine claims the fees are optional and intended to offset costs, critics argue this hinders transparency, particularly regarding police misconduct. The governor also vetoed provisions within the bill that would have loosened medical professional ethics standards and exempted some public officials from existing ethics requirements. Finally, other bills addressing consumer protection and establishing new commissions were signed into law.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood