The Supreme Court rejected Utah’s attempt to seize control of vast federal lands, delivering a victory for conservationists concerned about similar state-level challenges. The court’s decision, issued without explanation, halts Utah’s lawsuit seeking control of nearly half its federally managed land, an area comparable in size to South Carolina. This action comes amidst a Republican-controlled Congress’s adoption of rules potentially facilitating public land transfer or sale, raising further concerns about privatization and environmental degradation. While Utah leaders expressed disappointment, they indicated intent to pursue alternative legal avenues and collaboration with the federal government. Conservation groups, however, remain vigilant, prepared to contest any future efforts to diminish federal land protections.
Read More
Wyoming has sold a 1-square-mile parcel bordering Grand Teton National Park to the U.S. government for $100 million, a deal finalized after the governor approved the sale, preventing a potential developer sale. The federal government contributed $62.5 million, with private funding covering the remainder. This ecologically significant land, habitat to various wildlife, represents the last of four state-owned parcels added to the park over the past decade. The sale concluded after negotiations involving the Bureau of Land Management and concerns over development restrictions in southwestern Wyoming.
Read More
The 2024 presidential election significantly impacts the future of millions of acres of federally owned land in the West, particularly concerning the Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments in Utah. President Trump’s previous reduction of these monuments’ size, reversed by President Biden, is poised for another reversal if Trump wins reelection. This broader land management debate involves potential increased access for resource extraction and challenges to presidential authority over monument designation, signaled by recent Supreme Court activity. A conservative plan, Project 2025, even proposes repealing the Antiquities Act of 1906, further escalating the conflict between conservationists and those advocating for expanded resource use on public lands.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker