The recent actions by federal agents in Washington, D.C. exemplify a long-brewing far-right ideology, as evidenced by the sentiments expressed during the incident. This echoes earlier street confrontations spearheaded by groups like Patriot Prayer and the Proud Boys. These groups have a history of advocating violence against immigrants and leftists, and, at times, have received favorable treatment from law enforcement. The agents’ behavior, including taunts and the removal of anti-ICE banners, reflects this ongoing trend, revealing a concerning alignment of far-right ideology with official actions.
Read More
The Proud Boys, a group historically supportive of Donald Trump, issued a statement on Telegram opposing potential U.S. military intervention in the Israeli-Iranian conflict. This stance stems from their “America First” ideology, viewing such involvement as contrary to Trump’s campaign promises. The group’s opposition highlights a growing conservative schism over Trump’s hawkish foreign policy, with even prominent figures like Tucker Carlson expressing concern. Trump himself has indicated a decision on potential military action within two weeks, contingent upon negotiations with Iran. Despite their past support, the Proud Boys’ declaration reveals a limit to their allegiance based on this specific foreign policy issue.
Read More
The Proud Boys leaders’ demand for $100 million in compensation over their January 6th prosecutions is a truly astonishing development. The audacity of this claim, following their convictions for seditious conspiracy and other charges related to the attack on the Capitol, is staggering. It’s difficult to comprehend how individuals who participated in an attempt to overturn a democratic election could even contemplate such a lawsuit.
The sheer nerve involved is breathtaking. These individuals were convicted, their actions were undeniably aimed at undermining democratic processes, and yet they seek financial reward from the very government they sought to overthrow. It’s a blatant attempt to profit from sedition, a complete disregard for the rule of law, and an insult to every American who believes in the principles of democracy.… Continue reading
A bomb threat, allegedly from an account claiming to represent Enrique Tarrio, former Proud Boys leader, prompted the evacuation of the Principles First Summit in Washington, D.C. The summit, attended by prominent anti-Trump conservatives, was targeted with a threat referencing explosive devices and naming specific attendees. While organizers initially implicated Tarrio, they later clarified the threat’s origin remained unconfirmed. The incident occurred amidst heightened tensions in the city due to overlapping conservative gatherings, including CPAC. Tarrio himself denied involvement and threatened legal action.
Read More
Enrique Tarrio, the former leader of the Proud Boys, was recently arrested at the US Capitol. This arrest, occurring at the very location of the January 6th insurrection, immediately sparks a wave of reactions, ranging from outrage to cynical resignation. The sheer audacity of his return to the scene, considering his past involvement and the group’s designation as a terrorist organization in Canada, fuels the intense public response.
The timing of the arrest raises questions about the effectiveness of the justice system. Some believe that his prior involvement and subsequent release only emboldened him to engage in further potential criminal activity.… Continue reading
A Washington church, the target of vandalism by members of the Proud Boys, has been awarded the trademark to the group’s name and associated symbols. This ironic twist of fate, a true “FAFO” moment as some online commentators put it, is a source of widespread amusement and celebration. The legal victory seems particularly sweet, occurring during Black History Month, adding an extra layer of significance to the outcome.
The legal battle’s conclusion has sparked numerous jokes and suggestions online. Many find humor in the idea of the Proud Boys, known for their aggressive rhetoric and actions, being legally bound by a trademark held by the very community they sought to harm.… Continue reading
A Washington, D.C. judge awarded the Proud Boys’ trademarks to the Metropolitan African Methodist Episcopal Church, effectively prohibiting the group from using its name and associated logos. This decision follows a 2021 lawsuit filed by the church after the Proud Boys’ destruction of Black Lives Matter signs and their subsequent failure to pay over $1 million in damages. The ruling allows the church to pursue financial remedies from any Proud Boys merchandise sales. Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio condemned the decision as a “betrayal of justice.”
Read More
Aqua Blu Kitchen & Cocktails, a Toms River restaurant, faces intense backlash after offering a “Proud Boys Burger” as a weekly special. The burger’s name, referencing a designated hate group, sparked outrage online and resulted in a flood of angry calls and messages. Restaurant owner Cathy Varriale expressed deep regret, stating she was unaware of the group’s hateful ideology and that the burger was a poorly conceived joke. Despite removing the burger and issuing an apology, the restaurant continues to receive severe criticism and threats.
Read More
Following their release from prison, leaders of the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys, Stewart Rhodes and Enrique Tarrio, respectively, are regrouping and vowing retribution against their perceived enemies. Rhodes, whose 18-year sentence was commuted, defends his actions and calls for the prosecution of Capitol police and Justice Department lawyers. Tarrio, whose 22-year sentence was also commuted, similarly demands imprisonment for members of the January 6th committee and insists he is still a Proud Boy. Both men plan to re-engage in political activity.
Read More
Shane Lamond, former head of the Washington Metropolitan Police intelligence unit, was found guilty on four counts, including obstruction of justice and perjury, for providing confidential information to Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio. Prosecutors argued Lamond acted as a “double agent,” tipping off Tarrio about an arrest warrant, and subsequently lying to investigators. The verdict followed a bench trial featuring contentious testimony from Tarrio himself. Lamond’s defense claimed his actions were part of his job, but evidence revealed his personal support for the Proud Boys even after the January 6th Capitol attack.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood