Project 2025, a detailed conservative agenda, presented a rare opportunity for accurate prediction but was instead met with journalistic surprise despite its public availability. While advocacy groups like the ACLU warned of the plan’s negative impacts, their concerns were often dismissed as partisan, whereas Trump’s denials, even when demonstrably false, were treated as newsworthy facts. This journalistic approach, prioritizing neutrality and minimizing the appearance of bias, ultimately allowed Trump’s lies to be laundered into legitimate disagreements, hindering voters from understanding the gravity of the situation. The failure to simply acknowledge the obvious – the existence of the document, its authors, Trump’s endorsements, and his lies – directly hampered the ability of the press to inform the public.
Read More
Despite favorable polling for Democrats in the 2026 midterms, experts warn of potential threats to election integrity. Political scientist Austin Sarat highlights concerns based on former President Trump’s past actions and plans outlined in Project 2025, which aims to influence election outcomes. Democrats, as well as the public, must prepare to prevent potential issues. Additionally, the article emphasizes the emerging risks of AI-generated propaganda campaigns, adding another layer of complexity to the challenges facing democratic societies.
Read More
While Donald Trump’s suggestion of foregoing the November election garnered attention, the more concerning issue is the potential for compromised elections. Trump has expressed regret for not seizing voting machines in 2020, revealing a continued intent to undermine the electoral process. Trump and his allies are well-prepared to influence the 2026 midterms, utilizing strategies outlined in Project 2025 that include weaponizing federal power and potentially manipulating voting data. With Trump gaining more experience and ruthlessness, the upcoming elections pose a significant threat to free and fair voting.
Read More
As 2025 concludes, Project 2025 stands as the definitive policy plan of Trump’s second term, a blueprint largely crafted by veterans of his first administration. The plan, which Trump initially distanced himself from, has been systematically implemented, with roughly half of its goals achieved by mid-December. However, while the Heritage Foundation’s ideas now shape federal policy, the institution faces internal conflict and fracture. The administration’s actions regarding the press and public broadcasting directly reflect the project’s proposals, mirroring its strategies to consolidate executive power. Despite the success of Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation faces internal turmoil.
Read More
Analysis reveals that a substantial portion of Project 2025’s recommendations have been adopted as official policies under the Trump administration within the first year of his second term. Key areas mirroring the conservative blueprint include restructuring the federal workforce by removing civil servants and cutting funding. Furthermore, policies on education, immigration, and DEI initiatives align with the project’s goals, such as phasing out the Department of Education and implementing stricter immigration measures. Despite Trump’s claims of unfamiliarity, his administration has actively pursued these objectives, indicating a close alignment with Project 2025’s vision.
Read More
Mora Namdar, a part-time beauty salon owner and attorney, has been appointed as the Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs, granting her authority over visa approvals and denials for entry into the United States. Namdar previously served in an interim role within the State Department during Trump’s first term and also contributed to Project 2025, which has influenced the administration’s policy decisions. Her confirmation places a politically connected figure with media experience in a critical role that directly impacts who is allowed into the country. This appointment follows the administration’s ban of citizens from various European countries due to censorship of American viewpoints on social media.
Read More
Project 2025 writer resigns over boss’ ‘indefensible’ comments. Let’s unpack this. It’s pretty wild, isn’t it? A writer associated with Project 2025, which, let’s be honest, is a blueprint for a certain kind of future, resigned over their boss’s comments. Not, mind you, over the broad strokes of the project itself – the dismantling of education, the gutting of social safety nets, the potential restrictions on healthcare – but over the comments. Comments that, by any reasonable standard, are deeply problematic.
The crux of the matter revolves around the Heritage Foundation’s president, Kevin Roberts, and his defense of Tucker Carlson’s interview with Nick Fuentes.… Continue reading
Leaked applications for the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 initiative reveal that several individuals seeking roles in a potential Trump administration cited influences from Nazi political theorists and other far-right figures. The applications, sourced from a database breach, showcase the convergence of Republicans and the far-right, including applications from members of nativist and antisemitic groups. Several applicants expressed admiration for Carl Schmitt, a political theorist with ties to the Nazi regime, and Nayib Bukele, the authoritarian president of El Salvador. The applications also highlighted influences from prominent white nationalists and other fringe figures, raising concerns about the ideological leanings of potential appointees.
Read More
At a July 2023 rally, Senator Lindsey Graham faced significant disapproval from the crowd, being booed and jeered upon introduction. This reception highlights the challenges Graham faces with some of Trump’s most devoted supporters due to his past actions. Criticism stems from Graham’s association with the discredited Trump-Russia dossier, his hawkish stance on Russia, and his unwavering support for Israel. Moreover, his age, lack of children, and perceived obstruction of job cuts have been used against him.
Read More
The current administration, rather than moderating its stance, will likely escalate its policies, especially regarding immigration and its Project 2025 goals. Anticipate increased efforts to influence the upcoming midterms through legislation aimed at restricting voting access. Democrats should respond by addressing both economic concerns and threats to democracy, highlighting the administration’s failures and the ongoing dangers it poses.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood