Following the capitulation of eight Democratic senators, who voted with Republicans to end the government shutdown without concessions on healthcare, progressive organizers and lawmakers are calling for new leadership. These individuals, including Senators Catherine Cortez Masto, Dick Durbin, John Fetterman, and others, faced criticism for supporting a deal perceived as a surrender. Critics, like Ezra Levin, argue that the coordinated nature of the vote, particularly Schumer’s involvement, necessitates primary challenges and leadership changes within the Democratic Party. The overall sentiment is that the current leadership is ineffective and that the party needs to embrace a more confrontational approach to protect Americans’ healthcare.
Read More
‘Complete betrayal’: 2026 Democrats Slam Shutdown Deal
The air is thick with a sense of profound disappointment, a feeling that echoes the words: “Complete betrayal.” The recent deal to end the government shutdown has left a significant portion of the Democratic party reeling, their constituents’ voices seemingly unheard. The cost of healthcare is soaring, with some facing monthly premiums that are simply unaffordable. This is not just a policy disagreement; it’s a deep-seated frustration with the perceived weakness and lack of resolve within the party’s leadership. The sentiment is clear: these Democrats feel let down. The deal, they believe, prioritized political expediency over the needs of the very people they were elected to represent.… Continue reading
Following Israel’s large-scale attacks on Iran, progressive activists are calling for primary challenges against Democrats who support potential US military intervention. This comes as only a small percentage of Congress has backed resolutions opposing further US involvement, despite strong public opposition to war with Iran. Experts warn that Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s actions risk jeopardizing US interests and escalating the conflict. The lack of strong Democratic condemnation is further fueling calls for action.
Read More
Following Donald Trump’s return to office, some Democrats express frustration with the party’s perceived weak response, criticizing its messaging as ineffective and lacking the forceful counter-offensive needed. This perceived inaction stems from a combination of factors including a fear of appearing shrill, a desire to avoid repeating past mistakes, and a lack of cohesive leadership following Kamala Harris’s election loss. Progressive activists are calling for a more assertive approach, utilizing various platforms and strategies to connect with voters and highlight Trump’s actions. The hope is that a new DNC chair will provide the necessary direction and revitalize the party’s messaging and strategy.
Read More
Following President Trump’s second inauguration, prominent Democratic advocates criticized the party’s insufficient response to his numerous controversial executive actions. These actions included the dismissal of inspectors general, pardons for January 6th rioters, and an immigration crackdown, along with an unconstitutional attempt to revoke birthright citizenship. Frustration stemmed from Democrats’ perceived lack of forceful opposition, including votes by some in favor of Trump’s agenda, and calls for stronger action, including filibusters and voter mobilization, were made. Progressive voices urged a more aggressive, oppositional stance, emphasizing that public pressure on Democratic lawmakers is crucial to counter the Trump administration’s policies.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood