Protecting the public from misinformation requires vigilance, especially when it comes to health and medicine. The organization is committed to delivering unbiased, factual reporting to combat the spread of dangerous medical myths. Readers’ past support was crucial to the organization’s success and has allowed them to remain strong. Now, they are calling on readers to join and contribute once more to safeguard science and protect public health.
During a recent House Rules Committee hearing, Representative Maxwell Frost criticized Republicans for alleged hypocrisy regarding gun violence, arguing that their “pro-life” stance is inconsistent with their support of gun rights. Frost, a vocal advocate against gun violence, made these comments while debating an amendment to remove regulations on gun silencers and short-barreled firearms. He accused Republicans of prioritizing gun manufacturers over the safety of citizens, highlighting the contradiction between their stance on abortion and their lack of action on gun control. Although challenged by the committee chair, Frost’s remarks were ultimately allowed to remain on the record, drawing praise from some, who felt he was exposing a double standard in the debate.
Despite a life-threatening ectopic pregnancy requiring medical intervention, Florida Representative Kat Cammack, a co-chair of the House Pro-Life Caucus, has blamed “the left” for “fearmongering” rather than acknowledging the impact of the state’s restrictive abortion ban. Cammack’s doctors were initially hesitant to treat her due to the newly enacted six-week ban, which made them fear for their licenses or even potential prosecution. Although the intervention ultimately saved her life, Cammack refuses to label the procedure an abortion, instead criticizing what she views as liberal rhetoric surrounding such bans. This case highlights how ambiguous wording in restrictive abortion laws can cause medical professionals to fear and put patients at greater risk.
The US decision to end vaccine funding for impoverished nations is projected to result in over a million child deaths, a truly staggering statistic. This action sparks outrage and ignites a fierce debate about global responsibility, national priorities, and the very definition of “pro-life.”
The immediate consequence is the projected loss of life – over one million children are expected to perish due to preventable diseases. This grim forecast underscores the critical role these vaccine programs play in protecting vulnerable populations. The sheer scale of this potential tragedy is difficult to comprehend, making it a stark example of the human cost of political decisions.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood