This latest development signifies a further consolidation of influence by Trump within the Kennedy Center. The specifics of this “new move” remain undisclosed, but it’s anticipated to significantly impact the Center’s operations and direction. Observers speculate this action is part of a broader strategy to exert greater control over cultural institutions. The move is likely to spark further debate and controversy regarding the politicization of the arts.
Read More
This past week has exposed significant vulnerabilities within Donald Trump’s sphere of influence. A pattern of chaos and mounting resistance against his actions has emerged, highlighting internal divisions and weakening his overall standing. These challenges represent a significant shift from previous perceived strength and suggest growing instability. The cracks in his support and strategy are becoming increasingly apparent, prompting questions about his future influence. Whether these fissures will lead to a significant decline in power remains to be seen.
Read More
The Associated Press (AP) filed an amended lawsuit against the White House, seeking to overturn a ban on its journalists’ access to presidential events. The White House’s actions, described as retaliatory for AP’s refusal to comply with a presidential renaming of the Gulf of Mexico, have limited AP’s access to smaller events and even larger White House functions. This has resulted in delays and hampered the AP’s ability to provide timely news coverage. The ban, affecting both reporters and photographers, is viewed as a direct attack on press freedom and the public’s right to information. Dozens of news organizations, including some supportive of the president, have urged the White House to reverse its decision.
Read More
President Trump’s second-term Cabinet meeting concluded with him requesting positive coverage from Fox & Friends co-host Lawrence Jones, who was present due to recent White House press pool changes. The administration, unilaterally altering decades-long press pool selection practices, now hand-picks attendees, excluding outlets like the Associated Press. This decision follows a White House statement asserting that press access is a privilege, not a right, and a claim of unprecedented transparency. The White House Correspondents’ Association, bypassed in the process, vows to resist government control over White House coverage.
Read More
The White House barring Associated Press, Reuters, and other news organizations from covering a cabinet meeting is a deeply troubling development. It’s a blatant act that raises serious questions about the administration’s commitment to transparency and the free press. The decision to exclude these prominent and respected news agencies, especially Reuters, often considered a gold standard for neutral reporting, is particularly alarming.
This move suggests an attempt to control the narrative and limit access to information. With AP and Reuters used by almost every other news outlet, their exclusion creates a significant information gap, potentially leaving the public reliant on a more limited and potentially biased range of reporting.… Continue reading
A US judge denied the Associated Press’s request for immediate White House access reinstatement following a ban stemming from a dispute over the term “Gulf of America.” The Trump administration, citing the AP’s refusal to adopt the president’s executive order renaming the Gulf of Mexico, maintains its decision to bar the agency from presidential events. The judge scheduled a further hearing for March 20th to address the AP’s claim that the ban violates First Amendment rights. The AP vows to continue its fight for press freedom, while the White House celebrated the initial ruling.
Read More
The White House announced a restructuring of its press pool, granting the administration control over which outlets receive close-up presidential coverage, a departure from established tradition. This decision, framed as modernization and inclusivity by Press Secretary Leavitt, has raised significant First Amendment concerns due to the president’s selection of his own press corps. Critics argue this undermines press independence and the public’s right to unbiased information. The move follows a federal lawsuit by the Associated Press, challenging its exclusion from presidential events over a naming dispute, with a judge’s ruling pending.
Read More
A federal judge denied the Associated Press’s request for a temporary restraining order against a White House ban restricting their access to President Trump’s events. While expressing skepticism about the ban’s legality and describing it as “discriminatory,” the judge cited a lack of “irreparable harm” to the AP and scheduled a hearing for March 20th to consider a preliminary injunction. The White House maintains its position, asserting that access to the President is a privilege, not a right. The AP, supported by numerous news organizations, argues the ban violates the First and Fifth Amendments.
Read More
Launched Wednesday, DOGE.gov aims to track federal spending, displaying data from various agencies including budget, staffing levels, and employee age. However, the site inadvertently included classified information from the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), despite disclaimers excluding intelligence agencies. This breach raises concerns about data security and potential conflicts of interest given SpaceX’s contract with the NRO. The incident has prompted an urgent review within the intelligence community to assess the extent of the data exposure.
Read More
The White House barred Associated Press (AP) journalists from presidential events after the AP refused to use President Trump’s newly decreed name, “Gulf of America,” for the Gulf of Mexico. The White House deemed the AP’s continued use of “Gulf of Mexico” as a lie and retaliated by restricting access, a move condemned by press freedom advocates as a violation of the First Amendment. While the White House claims Oval Office access is a privilege, critics argue this action constitutes censorship and intimidation. Several major news organizations, including the New York Times and Washington Post, similarly rejected the name change, citing the body of water’s international boundaries and long-established name.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood