Judge Kaplan’s clarification in the Carroll case distinguished between the legal definition of “rape” in New York and its common understanding, emphasizing that the jury found Trump liable for actions aligning with the broader definition. This legal nuance was central to a subsequent $15 million settlement between Trump and ABC News, stemming from a report that used the term “rape” in describing the verdict. The settlement sparked internal outrage at ABC News, with concerns raised about a potential chilling effect on future critical coverage of Trump. Trump’s continued pursuit of defamation lawsuits against media outlets signals a strategy to stifle negative press coverage through litigation.
Read More
Former President Trump’s potential post-presidency actions pose a significant threat to press freedom. Key figures like Kash Patel, slated for a powerful FBI role, intend to use government agencies to investigate and potentially punish media outlets deemed critical of Trump. This strategy involves leveraging the FCC, the DOJ’s anti-drug division, and other government tools to suppress dissenting voices. This approach builds upon Trump’s prior behavior of using right-wing media to target perceived enemies, triggering investigations and further silencing criticism. The resulting pressure on government officials to act on these threats creates a volatile and dangerous situation for the media.
Read More
Kash Patel, Donald Trump’s nominee for FBI director, made controversial statements in a 2023 podcast interview about pursuing legal action against journalists who spread misinformation. While Patel later attempted to clarify his remarks, stating he only intended to target those who broke the law, his comments have sparked bipartisan concern. Critics cite these statements, along with his strong loyalty to Trump and embrace of conspiracy theories, as reasons for opposition to his nomination. This controversy is expected to be a major point of contention during his Senate confirmation hearings.
Read More
In response to Elon Musk’s transformation of X into a platform for disinformation and propaganda, the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ), representing over 295,000 journalists, will cease publishing content on the platform starting January 20, 2025. This decision, mirroring actions by other European news outlets, cites concerns about Musk’s collaboration with Donald Trump and the platform’s promotion of harmful content. The EFJ emphasizes its commitment to press freedom and ethical journalism in making this choice. This action reflects the growing concerns about the erosion of public trust in social media platforms and the threat to democratic discourse.
Read More
Donald Trump’s recent outburst against The New York Times, sparked by an article about a loyal aide, showcased his demand for media subservience based on his perceived election victory. This incident, analyzed with former Times public editor Margaret Sullivan, foreshadows potential future crackdowns on press freedom. Sullivan’s insights illuminate the potential strategies Trump may employ to control the narrative. The episode explores Trump’s tactics and the likely media response to his efforts to stifle dissent.
Read More
Trump’s recent call for Republicans to “kill” a reporter shield bill, unanimously passed by the House, has ignited a firestorm of controversy. This action directly challenges the very foundations of press freedom and raises serious questions about the future of investigative journalism. It seems to represent a stark departure from the principles often espoused by the Republican party, highlighting a potential internal conflict between party loyalty and core American values.
The bill in question, designed to protect journalists’ sources, has been met with the President’s explicit condemnation. His demand to quash the legislation speaks volumes about his apparent disdain for independent reporting, potentially signaling a broader attack on the media’s ability to hold power accountable.… Continue reading
Donald Trump’s opposition to the PRESS Act, bipartisan legislation protecting journalists and whistleblowers, demonstrates his disregard for press freedom. His public statements, including calls for retribution against critical media outlets and even suggesting harm to journalists, contradict his claims of supporting a free press. This stance is further solidified by a former advisor’s promise of retaliation against the “liberal media.” Trump’s actions and rhetoric suggest a belief that First Amendment protections only apply to those supporting his agenda.
Read More
Former US President Donald Trump has made a potentially dangerous statement at a rally in Pennsylvania, suggesting he wouldn’t mind if an attempt to assassinate him involved shooting through members of the media. Both Trump and current Vice President Kamala Harris have been speaking behind panels of bulletproof glass as a security measure following an assassination attempt against Trump in July. After pointing out the glass in front of him, Trump mentioned that there was no glass between him and the media, stating someone would have to “shoot through the fake news” to get him. This comment sparked concerns about it being a potential call for violence.
Read More
As FCC Chair, I stand firmly against any attempts to undermine the First Amendment, especially when it comes to calls to pull broadcast licenses over disagreements with content. The recent call by Trump to pull ABC licenses over the presidential debate is not only absurd but also dangerous for our democracy. The cornerstone of our democracy is the freedom of speech, and revoking licenses based on personal grievances sets a dangerous precedent that could stifle the free press.
It is ludicrous to even entertain the idea of pulling licenses just because a political candidate disagrees with the content or coverage. The role of the FCC is to regulate communication channels, not to bend to the whims of a sore loser who can’t handle criticism.… Continue reading
The recent news of Israel raiding and shutting down the Al Jazeera bureau in Ramallah, West Bank is a complex and contentious issue that has sparked a range of reactions and opinions. When delving into the history of Al Jazeera and its coverage of conflicts in the Middle East, it becomes apparent that the news agency has been embroiled in controversies and accusations of biased reporting for many years. The mention of past incidents where Al Jazeera allegedly spread false information to create sensationalized narratives underscores the deep-rooted mistrust that surrounds the media outlet.
The fact that Al Jazeera has been banned in various countries due to its alleged ties to terrorist organizations and its propagation of anti-Semitic and anti-Western sentiments raises valid concerns about the credibility and motives of the news agency.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood