A federal judge denied the Associated Press’s request for a temporary restraining order against a White House ban restricting their access to President Trump’s events. While expressing skepticism about the ban’s legality and describing it as “discriminatory,” the judge cited a lack of “irreparable harm” to the AP and scheduled a hearing for March 20th to consider a preliminary injunction. The White House maintains its position, asserting that access to the President is a privilege, not a right. The AP, supported by numerous news organizations, argues the ban violates the First and Fifth Amendments.
Read More
Launched Wednesday, DOGE.gov aims to track federal spending, displaying data from various agencies including budget, staffing levels, and employee age. However, the site inadvertently included classified information from the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), despite disclaimers excluding intelligence agencies. This breach raises concerns about data security and potential conflicts of interest given SpaceX’s contract with the NRO. The incident has prompted an urgent review within the intelligence community to assess the extent of the data exposure.
Read More
The White House barred Associated Press (AP) journalists from presidential events after the AP refused to use President Trump’s newly decreed name, “Gulf of America,” for the Gulf of Mexico. The White House deemed the AP’s continued use of “Gulf of Mexico” as a lie and retaliated by restricting access, a move condemned by press freedom advocates as a violation of the First Amendment. While the White House claims Oval Office access is a privilege, critics argue this action constitutes censorship and intimidation. Several major news organizations, including the New York Times and Washington Post, similarly rejected the name change, citing the body of water’s international boundaries and long-established name.
Read More
The Pentagon’s recent decision to double the number of news outlets with access to its office spaces has sparked considerable debate. Initially, a select group—the New York Times, NBC News, Politico, and National Public Radio—were asked to vacate their dedicated workspaces. This move, announced a week earlier, was followed by the inclusion of a new roster of media organizations.
This expanded list now includes the New York Post, Breitbart, the Washington Examiner, the Free Press, the Daily Caller, Newsmax, the Huffington Post, and One America News Network. A striking feature of this new group is the prominent presence of outlets generally considered conservative or aligned with the political views of former President Donald Trump.… Continue reading
Following similar actions by other federal agencies, the Department of Defense announced it is revoking press credentials for CNN and The Washington Post. This decision, impacting access to Pentagon briefings and facilities, reflects escalating tensions between the administration and select news organizations. The reasons cited remain unclear, but the move is viewed as a significant escalation in the ongoing conflict over press freedoms and access to information. This action further restricts media coverage of the Department of Defense.
Read More
Following similar actions taken against other news organizations, the Pentagon has revoked press credentials for CNN and The Washington Post. This decision reflects escalating tensions between the Department of Defense and select media outlets. The specific reasons for the revocation remain unclear, but it signals a significant deterioration in media access to the Pentagon. This action raises concerns about transparency and the public’s right to information regarding military affairs.
Read More
Compelled by the FCC chairman, CBS will provide unedited transcripts and camera footage of its Kamala Harris interview. This action stems from a $10 billion lawsuit filed by Donald Trump, alleging deceptive editing to favor Harris. The network maintains its editing practices were standard and denies wrongdoing, while press freedom advocates closely monitor the situation and potential settlement talks. Trump’s continued pursuit of the lawsuit, despite his election win, highlights the ongoing tension between the former president and media outlets. Similar past settlements between Trump and other media organizations have involved substantial financial payouts.
Read More
ABC News’s $15 million settlement with Donald Trump, stemming from a lawsuit over anchor George Stephanopoulos’s accurate but technically imprecise use of the word “rape,” exemplifies the media’s self-censorship. This capitulation, far from an isolated incident, reflects a broader trend of media organizations prioritizing appeasement of Trump over defending press freedoms, as seen in various instances of self-imposed restrictions. This self-censorship allows Trump to effectively silence dissent without needing legal changes, rendering the media complicit in eroding its own First Amendment rights. Ultimately, the future of press freedom depends on the public’s willingness to reject media outlets prioritizing self-preservation over truth.
Read More
Italian journalist Cecilia Sala, detained in Iran since December 19th on charges of violating Iranian law, has been released and returned to Italy. Her release, greeted with celebration by Italian officials including Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, followed weeks of headlines and speculation regarding a potential link to the arrest of an Iranian businessman in Italy on a US warrant. While Iran denied any connection between the two cases, intense diplomatic efforts secured Sala’s freedom. The circumstances surrounding her release remain unclear, though reports suggest involvement from US President-elect Trump.
Read More
Freelance journalist Mukesh Chandrakar, known for his anti-corruption reporting, was found murdered in a septic tank on a construction contractor’s property in Bijapur, Chhattisgarh. Police have arrested three suspects, with one still at large, and believe his recent report on a road construction scam led to his death. The killing sparked outrage among Indian media groups and calls for a thorough investigation into the journalist’s death. This incident underscores the ongoing dangers faced by journalists in India, highlighting the need for greater protection.
Read More