A bipartisan Senate effort to overturn President Trump’s new global tariffs failed in a 49-49 tie vote, with three Republicans joining Democrats in support. Despite a subsequent attempt to force another vote, this was defeated with the Vice President’s tie-breaking vote. Even if passed, the resolution lacked House support and faced a likely presidential veto. While Trump temporarily paused some tariffs, he simultaneously increased tariffs on China and administration officials offered vague assurances of ongoing trade negotiations.
Read More
A new poll reveals that 58% of Americans oppose President Trump’s tariffs, with a majority (53%) wanting Congress to intervene. Bipartisan support exists for a bill granting Congress a two-month review period for new tariffs, though its passage remains uncertain due to potential filibusters and a threatened presidential veto. Legal challenges are also underway, arguing that the President’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to justify tariffs is unlawful. The poll further indicates widespread public disapproval of Trump’s broader economic policies, with majorities believing they are increasing grocery prices and harming the stock market.
Read More
A dozen House Republicans are reportedly considering defying President Trump on a controversial tariff bill, a development that has sparked a flurry of reactions ranging from cautious optimism to outright cynicism. This potential rebellion, however small, represents a crack in the usually unwavering support Trump commands within his own party.
The sheer number of Republicans even contemplating defiance is noteworthy. It signals a growing unease, possibly fueled by the economic consequences of the tariffs, among some within the Republican ranks. While twelve representatives is a far cry from the number needed to override a presidential veto, it’s a significant symbolic gesture.… Continue reading
Despite unanimous Senate passage and initial bipartisan House support, the JUDGES Act, aiming to address federal court staffing shortages by creating 63 new judgeships, now faces a presidential veto. Democrats reversed their support due to concerns that President-elect Trump would appoint 22 of the new judges, highlighting the intense political polarization surrounding judicial appointments. Republicans argue the bill is a necessary solution to a long-standing problem, while the White House cites concerns about the timing and potential motives behind the bill’s passage. The bill’s future hinges on whether a compromise can be reached to secure Democratic backing in the next Congress.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood