Rep. Kay Granger’s prolonged absence from Congress, marked by a lack of voting since July, has been explained by an investigation revealing her residency at a Fort Worth assisted living facility. The Dallas Express located Granger after discovering her Fort Worth office was closed and following a tip. Her family confirmed she is dealing with dementia-related health issues, impacting her ability to travel to Washington, D.C. While residing in the independent living section of the facility, her health challenges have made consistent attendance in the House difficult.
Read More
Congress’ age debate is once again front and center, fueled by the revelation that a sitting representative has been residing in a retirement home for an extended period. This situation underscores a broader concern about the fitness of aging members to effectively serve their constituents. The lack of transparency surrounding the representative’s condition raises questions about accountability and the integrity of the legislative process.
The prolonged absence of this representative, while her staff and family continued to collect her salary, raises serious concerns about adequate representation for her constituents. Millions were effectively left without a voice in Congress for months. This highlights a systemic issue in our government, where seniority and relationships seem to outweigh merit and fresh ideas.… Continue reading
Texas Rep. Kay Granger, who is retiring, has not voted since July and was recently found residing in an assisted living facility. Her absence during crucial votes sparked criticism from constituents and party officials, highlighting concerns about her lack of representation for her district. This situation, along with recent health concerns among other senior elected officials, has reignited the debate surrounding age and term limits in Congress. Calls for term limits and campaign finance reform aim to address concerns about a gerontocracy and ensure effective representation.
Read More
Steve Bannon’s suggestion that Donald Trump could serve a third term in 2028 is a deliberate provocation, ignoring the clear language of the 22nd Amendment, which explicitly limits presidents to two terms, regardless of whether they are consecutive. While hypothetical scenarios involving the vice presidency or speakership could be explored, they contradict the amendment’s spirit and would likely necessitate Supreme Court intervention. Ultimately, Bannon’s claim is demonstrably false and designed to incite his base while generating controversy.
Read More
Mitch McConnell, the Senate Minority Leader, recently experienced a fall during a Senate Republican lunch. The incident immediately sparked a flurry of reactions, ranging from concern for his well-being to expressions of disdain and even dark humor. Many comments focused on his age and the potential dangers of falls for older individuals. The inherent risks associated with falls for someone in their eighties were highlighted, emphasizing the decreased muscle strength, balance issues, and reduced bone density common at that age. The gravity of such falls, potentially leading to serious injury or even death, was repeatedly underscored, referencing personal anecdotes about elderly relatives who suffered fatal falls.… Continue reading
While President Trump has repeatedly joked about serving more than two terms, his comments are lighthearted and not serious political pronouncements. Despite past quips about potentially running again in 2028, he has previously stated his intention to serve only one term, leaving office after his second term. Notably, he has also expressed his opposition to amending the Constitution to remove the two-term limit, indicating that he respects the constitutional framework surrounding presidential terms.
Read More
Despite the clear language of the Twenty-Second Amendment, which prohibits a president from serving more than two terms, President Trump has expressed interest in running for a third term, suggesting he might only do so if his potential opponent is deemed exceptionally strong. This statement disregards the longstanding constitutional restriction established in 1951, following President Roosevelt’s unprecedented four terms, and the unofficial precedent set by George Washington. The amendment unequivocally states that no person can be elected to the presidency more than twice, effectively barring Trump from seeking another term after his current one concludes.
Read More
The idea of term limits for Supreme Court justices is gaining traction among most Americans, and it’s not hard to see why. The concept of placing limits on how long individuals can hold such powerful positions is fundamentally sound. When the Constitution was written, the average lifespan was much shorter, and the notion of someone serving on the Supreme Court for decades was unfathomable. A 20-year term limit seems like a reasonable revision that could prevent the Court from becoming stagnant with justices who are no longer in touch with the times.
It’s clear that the Supreme Court needs stronger ethical guidelines and oversight.… Continue reading
As I read about President Joe Biden’s call for Supreme Court reforms, including 18-year term limits for justices, I couldn’t help but feel a sense of relief and optimism. The idea of implementing term limits for justices seems like such a logical step in the right direction. The system was not designed for lifelong appointments, and the notion that someone could hold a position of such immense power for six decades is concerning. Term limits would ensure a turnover of fresh perspectives and prevent stagnation within the highest court of the land.
The proposed reforms by President Biden, which also include a constitutional amendment to clarify that no one, not even a former president, is above the law, resonate strongly with me.… Continue reading
Joe Biden’s Supreme Court reforms are making waves, even among Donald Trump supporters. It’s intriguing to think about how many initiatives would garner bipartisan support if they weren’t labeled as Democratic proposals. The idea of term limits for Supreme Court justices seems to strike a chord with a majority of Americans, regardless of their political affiliation.
I’ve had similar experiences with family members who seemed to flip-flop on issues based solely on party lines. It’s disheartening to see the level of polarization in our country, where practical and common-sense reforms are dismissed simply because they are associated with a particular political figure.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood