Despite the clear language of the Twenty-Second Amendment, which prohibits a president from serving more than two terms, President Trump has expressed interest in running for a third term, suggesting he might only do so if his potential opponent is deemed exceptionally strong. This statement disregards the longstanding constitutional restriction established in 1951, following President Roosevelt’s unprecedented four terms, and the unofficial precedent set by George Washington. The amendment unequivocally states that no person can be elected to the presidency more than twice, effectively barring Trump from seeking another term after his current one concludes.
Read More
The idea of term limits for Supreme Court justices is gaining traction among most Americans, and it’s not hard to see why. The concept of placing limits on how long individuals can hold such powerful positions is fundamentally sound. When the Constitution was written, the average lifespan was much shorter, and the notion of someone serving on the Supreme Court for decades was unfathomable. A 20-year term limit seems like a reasonable revision that could prevent the Court from becoming stagnant with justices who are no longer in touch with the times.
It’s clear that the Supreme Court needs stronger ethical guidelines and oversight.… Continue reading
As I read about President Joe Biden’s call for Supreme Court reforms, including 18-year term limits for justices, I couldn’t help but feel a sense of relief and optimism. The idea of implementing term limits for justices seems like such a logical step in the right direction. The system was not designed for lifelong appointments, and the notion that someone could hold a position of such immense power for six decades is concerning. Term limits would ensure a turnover of fresh perspectives and prevent stagnation within the highest court of the land.
The proposed reforms by President Biden, which also include a constitutional amendment to clarify that no one, not even a former president, is above the law, resonate strongly with me.… Continue reading
Joe Biden’s Supreme Court reforms are making waves, even among Donald Trump supporters. It’s intriguing to think about how many initiatives would garner bipartisan support if they weren’t labeled as Democratic proposals. The idea of term limits for Supreme Court justices seems to strike a chord with a majority of Americans, regardless of their political affiliation.
I’ve had similar experiences with family members who seemed to flip-flop on issues based solely on party lines. It’s disheartening to see the level of polarization in our country, where practical and common-sense reforms are dismissed simply because they are associated with a particular political figure.… Continue reading
President Biden’s recent announcement of a bold plan to reform the Supreme Court and ensure that no President is above the law is a monumental step in the right direction for our country. The proposal includes crucial changes such as the elimination of immunity for crimes committed by a former President while in office, term limits for Supreme Court Justices, and the implementation of a binding code of conduct for Justices.
The proposal to remove immunity for crimes committed by a former President during their time in office is long overdue. No one should be exempt from federal criminal indictment, trial, conviction, or sentencing simply because they held the highest office in the land.… Continue reading
Biden set to announce support for major Supreme Court changes, including proposals for legislation to establish term limits for the justices and an enforceable ethics code. This move comes at a critical time when the Supreme Court’s decisions have become increasingly partisan and controversial. With the recent confirmation of Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the court’s conservative majority is poised to have a lasting impact on the direction of the country.
Term limits for Supreme Court justices are a sensible reform that should have bipartisan support. Lifetime appointments may have been appropriate when the Constitution was written, but in today’s political landscape, it has led to a situation where the future of our country hinges on the health and longevity of individual justices.… Continue reading
As I sit down to contemplate the recent news coming out of the NRA convention, where former President Donald Trump once again took center stage to float the idea of a three-term presidency, my mind is filled with a mixture of disbelief and sheer frustration. The notion of extending one’s stay in the highest office in the land beyond the traditional two terms is not only unprecedented but also deeply concerning.
To say that Trump’s remarks are alarming would be an understatement. The very essence of our democracy is rooted in the peaceful transfer of power and the adherence to term limits established by our founding fathers.… Continue reading
I have been following the recent uproar over the GOP-aligned organization’s call for the abolition of presidential term limits, potentially paving the way for a potential ‘Trump in 2028’ scenario. The idea of a president serving more than two terms goes against the core principles of democracy that our country was built upon. The thought of Trump potentially being in office for an extended period is certainly unsettling to many, considering his controversial and divisive reign during his first term.
As I read through the various comments and opinions on this matter, it is clear that there are strong feelings on both sides of the argument.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood