Presidential Power

Trump Claims Actions are Legal, Critics Call it a Fascist Coup

President Trump, citing a justification of “saving the country,” asserted his actions are above legal challenge, echoing a claim of executive immunity. This follows numerous executive actions, including budget cuts and targeting of civil servants, which have faced legal challenges. The Supreme Court’s precedent on presidential immunity, coupled with the executive branch’s growing power and the other branches’ inaction, suggests Trump’s assertion may hold weight. Vice President Vance’s comments further indicate a potential disregard for judicial oversight by the administration, reinforcing Trump’s belief in unchecked power.

Read More

Americans Fear Increased Presidential Power, Especially for Trump

Early in his presidency, Donald Trump issued numerous executive orders, many facing legal challenges, prompting a Pew Research Center survey on public opinion regarding expanded presidential power. A significant majority (65%) deemed granting Trump more power “too risky,” while only 33% believed it would improve problem-solving. This skepticism extended to presidential power in general, with 78% expressing concern about its expansion. Partisan divides were evident, with Republicans more likely than Democrats to favor increased presidential authority for Trump.

Read More

Judge Blocks Trump From Firing Corruption Investigator

Judge Amy Berman Jackson issued a temporary restraining order, blocking President Trump’s dismissal of Hampton Dellinger, head of the Office of Special Counsel (OSC), pending a February 26th hearing. Dellinger’s firing, lacking stated cause, violates a 1978 law requiring justification for removal. This case tests the limits of presidential power over independent agencies, particularly concerning the OSC’s role in protecting whistleblowers and enforcing the Hatch Act. The Trump administration’s argument that the congressional law is unconstitutional challenges established legal precedent regarding independent agency heads.

Read More

Eight Fired Inspectors General Sue Trump Over Dismissals

Eight former inspectors general, fired by President Trump, filed a lawsuit alleging unlawful termination, violating federal laws designed to protect their oversight roles. The suit claims the firings lacked the legally mandated 30-day notice to Congress and substantive rationale, and that the former officials were illegally barred from their duties. The lawsuit seeks to overturn their dismissals, arguing they remain inspectors general until legally removed. This action follows bipartisan congressional concern and is one of many legal challenges against the Trump administration regarding the dismissal of government officials.

Read More

Trump’s Powerless Oval Office Appearance Sparks Outrage

Donald Trump’s recent appearance in the Oval Office alongside Elon Musk has sparked a wave of commentary focusing on an image many perceive as the most powerless depiction of a president ever captured on camera. The scene, where Musk seemingly dominated the press conference while Trump passively remained seated, generated considerable discussion about the power dynamic between the two figures.

The sheer visual impact of the event is undeniable. Many viewers felt that Trump’s subdued demeanor and apparent lack of control over the proceedings presented a striking contrast to the usual image of a powerful president commanding attention. The fact that Musk, an individual outside the traditional political structure, appeared to be leading the conversation further contributed to this sense of unusual powerlessness.… Continue reading

Musk’s Mismanagement: Billionaire’s Incompetence Exposed

In a seemingly calculated move, Adams publicly aligned himself with Trump, even requesting meetings with Trump and his border czar, Tom Homan, and criticizing the Democratic Party. This culminated in a meeting with Trump at Mar-a-Lago, shortly before Adams’s indictment was dropped. The timing suggests a possible exchange: Adams’s pardon in return for facilitating a stricter crackdown on immigration in New York City, benefiting both Trump and Homan. This strategy resulted in Adams avoiding prosecution while allowing Trump’s desired immigration policies to potentially gain traction in the city.

Read More

Trump Lawsuit: Firing of Ethics Enforcer Violated Century of Precedent

Two lawsuits filed within a week challenge President Trump’s dismissals of Biden-appointed officials. Hampton Dellinger, the former head of the Office of Special Counsel, and Gwynne A. Wilcox, a former National Labor Relations Board employee, allege unlawful termination, citing violations of established removal procedures and a century of legal precedent protecting independent agency officials. Both lawsuits contend that the dismissals were politically motivated and without proper cause. The plaintiffs argue these actions undermine the independence of crucial government agencies and jeopardize their ability to fulfill their statutory mandates.

Read More

Trump Orders Penny Minting Halt: Constitutional Concerns Raised

President Trump announced on Truth Social his directive to halt the production of new pennies, citing the minting cost exceeding the coin’s value. This decision aligns with the administration’s broader cost-cutting agenda, aiming to eliminate wasteful government spending. The President claims the cost of producing each penny is over two cents. The order was issued to the Treasury Secretary, effectively ending the minting of new one-cent coins.

Read More

Time Magazine Cover Sparks Outrage: Elon Musk Behind the Resolute Desk

The upcoming four years represent a pivotal moment for America, demanding unwavering commitment to free and unbiased journalism. HuffPost, facing this challenge, is launching an ad-free experience for contributing supporters. This initiative aims to ensure continued delivery of crucial news coverage. The organization requires reader support to maintain its mission of providing free, fair news during this critical period.

Read More

Trump’s USAID Power Grab: Congress, Courts, and the Limits of Presidential Authority

Trump ‘does not have the authority to abolish’ USAID, according to the Congressional Research Service. This assertion highlights a critical point of contention within the current political climate: the extent of presidential power, particularly when challenged by established legal and constitutional frameworks. The very fact that such a declaration needs to be made underscores a growing concern about the erosion of checks and balances within the American system of government.

The issue isn’t simply about USAID’s potential dismantling; it’s symbolic of a broader pattern. Previous attempts to curtail or eliminate USAID, such as those under Nixon, reveal a recurring pattern where those seeking authoritarian power tend to view foreign aid as an obstacle.… Continue reading