Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor emphasized the importance of civic involvement and education during a recent speech. She questioned the public’s understanding of fundamental American principles, including the distinction between a president and a monarch. Sotomayor expressed concern over a lack of knowledge regarding the functions of the branches of government, advocating for more comprehensive civic education to address this deficit. While the justice did not directly address President Trump, her remarks touched on themes relevant to ongoing debates about the balance of power within the executive branch.
Read More
The case “GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants” revolves around the legality of deploying military forces within California, specifically concerning the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878. The core issue at hand centers on whether then-President Trump’s actions in deploying the National Guard and other military troops into Los Angeles were in violation of the law. The court’s decision, at least initially, appears to side with Newsom and the plaintiffs, issuing an injunction against the deployment. The fundamental concern is that federal military forces were being used for law enforcement duties, which the Posse Comitatus Act generally prohibits.… Continue reading
Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook is suing former President Donald Trump over his attempt to remove her from her position, sparking a legal challenge regarding the Fed’s autonomy. Trump cited “sufficient reason” to believe Cook made false statements regarding her mortgage, which he says allows him to remove her. Cook’s lawsuit seeks to invalidate Trump’s firing order and names Fed Chairman Jerome Powell as a defendant. This legal battle highlights the contentious relationship between Trump and the Fed, particularly concerning interest rate policy.
Read More
House Speaker Mike Johnson asserted that the War Powers Act is unconstitutional, specifically regarding President Trump’s recent military actions in Iran. Johnson believes Trump’s actions are within his Article 2 powers and that the resolution barring U.S. military action in Iran will not pass. Though a privileged resolution introduced by Rep. Thomas Massie could force a vote, Johnson indicated it may be withdrawn due to a ceasefire, potentially preventing a conflict over the president’s authority. Trump has criticized Massie, which could influence the resolution’s fate.
Read More
In his second term, President Trump has issued 383 executive orders, surpassing all predecessors since Eisenhower, with a pace exceeding even his own first term and that of President Biden’s entire presidency. Many of these orders, including those targeting transgender rights, immigration, and education, appear aimed at his political base. Significant early actions included rescinding numerous Biden-era orders and initiating controversial policy changes. While falling short of FDR’s record, Trump’s prolific executive order output is unprecedented in recent history.
Read More
Nationwide “No Kings” protests, targeting perceived authoritarian tendencies in the Trump administration, are planned for June 14th, coinciding with a large military parade in Washington D.C. and Trump’s birthday. The protests, organized by the 50501 Movement, aim to counter what organizers see as a display of excessive military power and challenge Trump’s leadership. President Trump dismissed the protests, stating he is not a king, while simultaneously promoting the military parade as a celebration of the U.S. Army’s history. The juxtaposition of the parade and protests highlights deep divisions regarding presidential power and democratic norms.
Read More
Approximately 300 National Guard troops were deployed to Los Angeles by President Trump, marking the first such deployment without a governor’s request in decades. This action, taken amidst protests against immigration enforcement, followed days of clashes between demonstrators and federal agents, resulting in arrests and the use of tear gas. Governor Newsom and Mayor Bass criticized the deployment as an overreaction, while the Trump administration justified it as a necessary response to quell unrest and protect federal facilities. The deployment has sparked significant political debate, with some viewing it as an overreach of presidential power.
Read More
The Trump administration is escalating its campaign to expand executive power, targeting the Library of Congress and claiming it falls under executive branch authority. This assertion, along with attempts to influence other independent agencies like the GAO, represents a broader effort to blur the lines separating government branches. The administration’s actions have faced some resistance, including legal challenges and pushback from Congress, though limited. The White House’s rationale centers on a claimed mandate to rein in spending and reshape governance, ignoring established norms of separation of powers. Control over the Library would grant access to vast amounts of sensitive data, including congressional research requests and copyright information.
Read More
Justice Barrett’s initial recusal from a case involving public funding for religious schools resulted in a 4-4 split, upholding a lower court decision. However, she subsequently joined a majority opinion in *Trump v. Wilcox et al.*, allowing the president to fire heads of executive agencies despite congressional mandates to the contrary. This decision, criticized by Justice Kagan’s dissent, potentially overturns a century-old precedent and weakens the independence of executive agencies, granting the president significantly more power. The ruling’s disregard for established legal procedure and precedent raises concerns about the concentration of presidential power, echoing historical anxieties about executive overreach.
Read More
The Supreme Court ruled that President Trump could remove two federal agency board members, Gwynne Wilcox and Cathy Harris, while their lawsuits challenging their termination are pending. This decision, while allowing the removals, strongly implied that Federal Reserve board members possess unique protection against presidential dismissal. The Court’s majority reasoned that the executive power vested in the President allows removal of executive officers, subject to limited exceptions. However, a dissenting opinion argued this ruling undermines established precedent protecting the independence of administrative agencies, including the Federal Reserve, and creates an unnecessary exception. The Court’s stay order temporarily allows the removals but does not definitively resolve the broader constitutional questions involved.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood