President Trump’s pardon of former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández, convicted of drug trafficking, has drawn criticism from within his own party. Several Republican senators expressed confusion and concern, citing the mixed message sent by pardoning a convicted drug trafficker while also threatening action against drug trafficking in Venezuela. Some lawmakers, such as Senator Rand Paul, questioned the logic and potential consequences of the pardon, considering Hernandez’s role in facilitating the movement of hundreds of tons of cocaine. Trump’s recent pardons, including those of individuals convicted of financial crimes and January 6th rioters, have reignited debate about the scope of presidential pardon power, with some calling for constitutional amendments to limit its application.
Read More
In a recent proclamation, President Donald Trump pardoned numerous political allies, including Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, and Mark Meadows, for their involvement in alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election. According to the document, the pardons are described as a step toward national reconciliation and cover a range of individuals, including co-defendants charged in Georgia. The pardons are only applicable to federal charges and do not extend to state or local charges, nor do they apply to Trump himself. Additionally, clemency was granted to a retired police officer convicted of stalking for the Chinese government and former baseball star Darryl Strawberry for a tax evasion charge.
Read More
Greg Rosen, the former chief of the Justice Department’s Capitol Siege Section, resigned his position to join a private law firm. Rosen expressed alarm at President Trump’s pardons of January 6th rioters, deeming them a dangerous message condoning political violence. He highlighted the Justice Department’s exceptionally high conviction rate in these cases, attributing it to overwhelming evidence, not bias. Rosen also criticized the subsequent demotion or dismissal of prosecutors involved in these cases, viewing it as an attack on the department’s independence.
Read More
Former Culpeper County Sheriff Scott Jenkins, convicted of bribery and corruption, received a presidential pardon from Donald Trump before beginning his 10-year sentence. This highly publicized pardon, unlike many historically quiet affairs, followed Jenkins’ public campaign and assertions of innocence. The trend continues with similar pardons granted to Paul Walczak and the Chrisley family, each involving public lobbying and allegations of quid pro quo. This pattern, combined with Trump’s own financial dealings, suggests a normalization of corruption and a perception of impunity for those with wealth or political connections.
Read More
President Trump pardoned Todd and Julie Chrisley, stars of *Chrisley Knows Best*, for their 2022 convictions of fraud and tax evasion. Their daughter, Savannah Chrisley, claims Trump cited their unfair treatment and stated they didn’t “look like terrorists,” despite no terrorism charges ever being filed. The pardon follows a string of similar pardons issued by Trump for other white-collar criminals. The White House maintains the pardons were granted to deserving individuals who faced overly harsh sentences.
Read More
Lawyers are reportedly quoting fees of $1 million or more to secure presidential pardons for clients, highlighting a disturbing trend of legalized bribery within the system. This exorbitant cost underscores the perception that access to justice, or at least freedom from its consequences, is now a commodity available only to the wealthy.
The sheer audacity of these million-dollar pardon packages suggests a blatant disregard for the principles of equal justice under the law. It’s a system where the weight of legal repercussions seems directly proportional to one’s financial standing, leaving those without substantial resources to navigate a vastly different, and far less forgiving, legal landscape.… Continue reading
Former Las Vegas councilwoman Michele Fiore, convicted of defrauding a police memorial fund of over $70,000 for personal use, received a full pardon from President Trump. This pardon follows the rejection of Fiore’s appeal for a new trial and comes shortly after Trump appointed a close friend of Fiore’s to a key position in the Nevada U.S. Attorney’s office. The White House cited Fiore’s “outspoken conservative views” as justification, while critics condemned the pardon as political favoritism and a betrayal of law enforcement. Fiore’s sentencing, which carried the potential for a lengthy prison term, has been vacated.
Read More
In a recent Fox News interview, Donald Trump falsely claimed that President Biden preemptively pardoned members of the January 6th House select committee, preventing him from retaliating. He also lauded his own pardons of Capitol rioters, despite their unpopularity, and made unsubstantiated claims about the committee destroying evidence and the identity of the “pipe bomber.” Trump further alleged that the committee was composed of “sick people” and that Biden’s actions were “egregious,” requiring criminal sanctions. Finally, he reiterated his desire to release the full Jeffrey Epstein files.
Read More
President Trump declared former President Biden’s pardons void due to their alleged signing via autopen, a claim unsupported by evidence. This prompted widespread online commentary questioning the validity of numerous contracts signed using digital tools like DocuSign. Many social media users jokingly suggested this logic invalidated their own loan agreements and other signed documents. The legal implications of challenging autopen and digital signatures are far-reaching, potentially affecting millions of daily transactions. Despite Trump’s claims, the Department of Justice previously affirmed the legality of presidential autopen use.
Read More
Following a report questioning the validity of President Biden’s pardons, issued before leaving office, Donald Trump declared them “VOID,” prompting former Rep. Adam Kinzinger to challenge Trump to file criminal charges. Kinzinger, a frequent Trump critic and recipient of one of the pardons, argues that Trump’s actions are a distraction and that the use of an autopen for presidential signatures is not prohibited and has historical precedent. Legal experts have confirmed that a president’s handwritten signature is not required for a pardon to be valid. Kinzinger confidently asserts that any legal challenge would be easily defeated in court.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood