Presidential Pardon

Pardoned Jan. 6 Rioter Wanted for Soliciting a Minor

Andrew Taake, a Texas man pardoned by President Trump for his participation in the January 6th Capitol attack, is now wanted in Texas on a pre-existing charge of soliciting a minor. Despite a request from Texas authorities, Taake was released from federal prison on January 20th. This release, along with similar instances involving pardoned individuals from Indiana, Florida, and Kentucky, highlights the ongoing challenges faced by law enforcement in handling those released under the blanket pardons. The Harris County District Attorney’s office is actively working to apprehend Taake.

Read More

Pardoned Jan. 6 Defendant Killed in Police Shooting

Matthew Huttle, a 42-year-old man pardoned for his participation in the January 6th Capitol riot, was fatally shot by a Jasper County sheriff’s deputy during a traffic stop. The shooting followed an altercation in which Huttle allegedly resisted arrest and possessed a firearm. An Indiana State Police investigation is underway, and the deputy is on paid administrative leave. Huttle had previously pleaded guilty to entering a restricted building during the riot and received a presidential pardon earlier this month.

Read More

Pardoned January 6th Rioter Killed Resisting Arrest

Matthew Huttle, a 42-year-old Indiana man pardoned by President Trump for his participation in the January 6th Capitol riot, was fatally shot by a Jasper County sheriff’s deputy during a traffic stop. The shooting occurred after Huttle allegedly resisted arrest and struggled with the officer; Huttle was reportedly armed at the time. Indiana State Police are investigating the incident, and the deputy involved has been placed on administrative leave. Huttle’s death follows a pattern of post-pardon legal troubles for other January 6th participants.

Read More

Jan. 6 Rioters Reject Trump Pardons: Accountability Over Loyalty

Another January 6th rioter has rejected a pardon offered by Donald Trump, stating simply, “I did those things.” This action, while seemingly straightforward, speaks volumes about the complex landscape of accountability, regret, and the enduring impact of the events of that day.

The rejection of a presidential pardon is a significant act, especially considering the potential ramifications for the individual’s future. It implies a level of self-awareness and acceptance of responsibility that is rarely seen in similar situations. This individual is prioritizing personal integrity and the consequences of their actions over a potential reprieve from legal penalties.

This decision also underscores the lasting effects of the January 6th insurrection.… Continue reading

Trump Pardonee Rearrested on Federal Gun Charges

Daniel Charles Ball, indicted on numerous felony charges for his violent participation in the January 6th Capitol riot, including assaulting officers and deploying an explosive device, had his case dismissed following a presidential pardon. However, this dismissal was short-lived; Ball was arrested the following day on separate federal charges of firearm possession by a convicted felon. These new charges, stemming from prior convictions and unrelated to the riot, are not subject to the presidential pardon. His arrest highlights that presidential pardons do not offer protection against future criminal activity.

Read More

Pardoned Jan 6 Rioter Rearrested on Gun Charges

A recently pardoned January 6th rioter was arrested just one day later on gun charges. This swift turn of events highlights the complexities of presidential pardons and underscores the potential consequences for individuals with prior criminal records who may misunderstand the scope of a pardon. The pardon, while seemingly offering a clean slate, doesn’t erase past convictions or automatically restore gun rights. This particular case serves as a stark reminder of this legal nuance.

The rioter’s prior criminal history, which included felony convictions for domestic violence, resisting law enforcement, and battery on a law enforcement officer, played a significant role in his subsequent arrest.… Continue reading

Trump Pardons Silk Road Founder: Controversy Erupts Over Political Pardon

Former President Trump issued a full pardon to Ross Ulbricht, the founder of the Silk Road online drug marketplace, who had received a life sentence in 2015. This action, praised by the Libertarian Party, follows Trump’s previous announcement of a sentence commutation and aligns with his stated intention to significantly lessen cryptocurrency regulation. Ulbricht’s lawyer expressed relief at the correction of an injustice, while the pardon’s timing coincides with expectations of a broader shift in cryptocurrency policy under Trump’s administration. The pardon has sparked debate considering the significant scale of illicit activity facilitated by Silk Road.

Read More

Democrats Urge Garland to Release Full Trump Report Despite Ongoing Cases

House Judiciary Democrats, led by Ranking Member Jamie Raskin, urged Attorney General Garland to release the unreleased portion of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report on President Trump’s handling of classified documents. They argue that the public’s right to know outweighs concerns about ongoing prosecutions of Trump’s co-defendants, suggesting dismissing those charges as a solution to ensure transparency. This recommendation stems from fears that Trump would halt the prosecutions and suppress the report if re-elected. The Justice Department has yet to respond to this request. The first volume of the report detailed Trump’s actions leading up to the January 6th Capitol attack and his promotion of false election fraud claims.

Read More

Trump Sentenced, Faces No Punishment in Hush Money Case

Despite a jury finding President-elect Trump guilty on 34 felony counts related to hush-money payments, Justice Merchan sentenced him to an unconditional discharge. This decision, issued ten days before Trump’s inauguration, cited legal protections afforded to the presidential office as the overriding factor, not mitigating the seriousness of the crimes. Merchan stated that jail time would infringe upon the highest office in the land, making an unconditional discharge the only lawful sentence. Trump, appearing virtually, maintained his innocence and characterized the trial as a politically motivated attack.

Read More