Don’t Believe John Roberts. The Supreme Court Just Made the President a King.
When I first read about the recent Supreme Court ruling regarding the immunity of presidents for official acts, I was taken aback. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. argued that a prosecutor cannot use a president’s official acts as evidence of a crime, effectively creating a shield of immunity for sitting and former presidents. This decision just feels like a dangerous step towards unchecked power and authoritarianism.
The dissenting views, especially from Justice Sonia Sotomayor and Justice Amy Coney Barrett, highlighted the potential loopholes and dangers of this ruling.… Continue reading
It’s a relief to see Congressman Joe Morelle taking action to reverse the U.S. Supreme Court’s immunity decision. The fact that someone in our government is paying attention and addressing this crucial issue gives me a glimmer of hope. Potential amendment texts need to be thoroughly vetted and discussed so that we can find a viable solution to this pressing problem. Leaving the SCOTUS decision unchallenged is simply not an option for the long-term health of our democracy.
The idea of a president using immunity to commit and conceal crimes is deeply troubling. While most U.S. presidents have been honorable individuals, they have all been ambitious.… Continue reading
As I sit here contemplating the current state of affairs in the United States, I can’t help but feel a deep sense of concern and unease. The recent Supreme Court ruling on immunity for Presidents has sent shockwaves through the nation, leaving many of us questioning the future of our democracy. With President Biden set to address this ruling, I find myself torn between hope and trepidation about what lies ahead.
It’s clear that this ruling has the potential to fundamentally alter the balance of power within our government. The idea that a President could potentially have immunity for criminal acts committed while in office raises serious questions about accountability and the rule of law.… Continue reading
The recent Supreme Court immunity ruling allowing presidents to ignore laws is nothing short of a disaster for the democratic fabric of our nation. When I think about the potential ramifications of this ruling, I am filled with a sense of dread and urgency. The fact that this ruling could set a precedent for unchecked executive power is deeply troubling. The thought that our democracy could be eroded by a single decision is frightening.
As I reflect on the potential implications of this ruling, I can’t help but feel a sense of frustration and anger. The idea that future presidents could exploit this ruling to further their own agendas at the expense of the rule of law is deeply disturbing.… Continue reading
The US Supreme Court has just completed what can only be described as Trump’s attempted coup on January 6th. The ruling concerning Presidential immunity has sent shockwaves through the nation, with many seeing the decision as a clear sign of the Supreme Court justices acting as accomplices in Trump’s dangerous power play. It’s no secret that the whole strategy over the past four years was to find weaknesses in the judicial system, oppose any actions taken by Biden, and pave the way for a Trump comeback with even more authority to commit crimes.
It’s a diabolically clever plan that seems to be working, and frankly, it’s sickening.… Continue reading
I cannot help but feel disillusioned as I read about the latest development in Trump’s hush money case. The judge has decided to delay Trump’s sentencing to examine how a recent Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity could impact the outcome. It is disheartening to witness the lengths to which individuals will go to shield Trump from facing the consequences of his actions.
One of the main arguments being made is that Trump’s communications while he was president should not be admissible as evidence in a criminal trial for events that occurred before his presidency. This raises the question of whether Trump’s personal dealings, such as the Stormy Daniels pay-off, can be considered official acts of the presidency.… Continue reading
The recent news regarding the Trump Hush-Money Judge ominously warning that a sentence may never come has left me speechless, frustrated, and deeply concerned for the state of our democracy. The Supreme Court’s decision to potentially never render a sentence on Trump’s convictions is a stark reminder of the power dynamics at play and the erosion of accountability in our political system.
It is disheartening to witness how a confident, tall, white, broad-shouldered narcissist like Trump can manipulate the legal system to evade consequences for his actions. The delay in sentencing to assess the impact of the Supreme Court’s ruling on Presidential immunity raises questions not only about Trump’s culpability but also about the integrity of our judicial process.… Continue reading
As an American citizen, I am deeply troubled by the recent decision made by the Supreme Court. The very foundation of our nation, the idea that Presidents are not Kings, has been upended. The conservative justices, claiming to be originalists, have chosen to ignore history altogether, thereby creating a shocking new precedent: the president is above the law. This ruling is a dangerous step towards turning the President into a monarch, erasing the principles on which the United States was founded.
The concept of a President being above the law is antithetical to the core values of democracy. George Washington himself rejected any idea of being a king, firmly establishing the notion that the United States would never bow to such authoritarian rule.… Continue reading
As a concerned citizen watching the recent Supreme Court decision on Trump’s immunity case, I am left feeling a sense of deep unease about the implications this ruling holds for our democracy. The 6-3 vote along ideological lines, with Chief Justice Roberts affirming that presidents enjoy immunity for “official acts” but not for “unofficial acts”, sets a dangerous precedent. This ruling essentially shields a president from prosecution for actions carried out within their scope of authority, no matter how egregious those actions may be.
The dissent by Justice Sotomayor eloquently outlines the grave consequences of this decision, emphasizing how it fundamentally alters the relationship between the President and the American people.… Continue reading
The recent ruling by the Supreme Court granting former President Donald Trump immunity for ‘official’ acts has sent shockwaves through the American political landscape. As someone who values democracy and the rule of law, this decision is deeply concerning. It raises questions about accountability and the limits of presidential power.
The notion that the President enjoys immunity for official acts, as defined by Chief Justice John Roberts in the majority opinion, seems to be a dangerous precedent. It sets a troubling standard that could potentially shield future presidents from legal repercussions for questionable actions taken while in office. This immunity could embolden leaders to act with impunity, knowing that they are beyond the reach of the law.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood