Donald Trump’s cabinet picks reveal a pattern of appointing individuals who have previously lost elections, including those defeated by him and within the Republican party. This strategy contrasts with his public rhetoric of celebrating “winners,” suggesting a deliberate effort to select loyalists unlikely to oppose his agenda. These appointments, encompassing figures from various races and levels of government, indicate a prioritization of unwavering allegiance over experience or prior electoral success. Trump’s stated goal is to avoid the “mistakes” of his first term by surrounding himself with completely compliant individuals.
Read More
Efforts by Trump to circumvent the Senate’s “advice and consent” role in confirming appointments are unconstitutional. Proposed methods, including using recess appointments during a manufactured Senate recess or employing the president’s power to adjourn Congress, are legally flawed and contradict established constitutional interpretations and historical precedent. These schemes would represent an abuse of power, undermining the checks and balances integral to American self-governance. The Senate’s refusal to cooperate and potential judicial intervention would be crucial in preventing such an autocratic maneuver. Such actions are not only unlawful but fundamentally disrespectful of the Constitution.
Read More
FBI background checks for Trump’s nominees are absolutely essential, and this is a point of agreement even among former Senate counsels from opposing political parties. The gravity of these positions demands thorough vetting; overlooking this process would be incredibly reckless and potentially disastrous.
The potential consequences of skipping these checks are simply too significant to ignore. Important information, crucial for judging a nominee’s fitness for office, might be buried or never come to light. This isn’t just about following procedure; it’s about safeguarding the integrity and security of our nation.
The process itself is not overly burdensome. Federal agencies conduct these background checks regularly, making the process itself well-established and efficient.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood